GOOD NEWS NY; the state supreme court may overturn those stupid gun laws., page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 30 times
Topic started on 6-3-2013 @ 11:08 AM by FortAnthem
Members of the NY state supreme court have demanded that the state prove that the laws are constitutional and that they weren't rushed through too quickly, which would be another constitutional violation.

New York Courts May Kill Cuomo Assault on Gun Rights

In a move widely celebrated by activists, New York Supreme Court justices last week ordered Democrat Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s administration to prove by the end of next month that its recent assault on gun rights is actually constitutional — critics and experts say it clearly violates both the U.S. and state constitutions. The extraordinary speed used to adopt the controversial legislation, which appears to have violated a separate provision in the state constitution, is also facing scrutiny from the judicial branch.

If the state government fails to prove its case on both counts in the time frame provided, the unprecedented attack on gun rights may be struck down entirely, or at least temporarily rendered void.

The first order, issued by State Supreme Justice Deborah Chimes on February 27, demands that the state government prove that its unprecedented infringements on gun rights are indeed constitutional by April 29. The lawsuit was initiated by gun dealer Edward Holtz, who argues that the unconstitutional statute, among other problems, put him out of business, left him with merchandise he cannot sell, and violates his rights. According to the order issued by Justice Chimes, if the state is unable to prove that its statute is constitutional by the deadline, she will temporarily enjoin it.

The other major lawsuit making its way through the courts resulted in an order issued on March 1 by State Supreme Court Justice Gerald Connolly. The justice granted a hearing to the more than 1,250 plaintiffs, who are arguing, among other points, that the state’s decision to waive the constitutionally mandated three-day review before voting on bills represents a blatant violation of the state constitution.

The gun owners, who are representing themselves in the case under the banner of “We the People of New York,” also say the dubious process used to adopt the unconstitutional law violates the rights to free speech, property ownership, and to petition the government — all of which are guaranteed in the U.S. and New York constitutions. If the Cuomo administration and lawmakers who supported the lawless infringements fail to “show cause” for the assault in court by March 11, the court would also enjoin the controversial statute.

The New American

It looks like all hope is not lost for the poor folks of New York just yet as the courts may reign in some of the insanity and repeal those stupid, panicky gun laws passed in the wake of Sandy Hook.

I wonder how this will affect the other states trying to infringe on gun-owner's rights? Hopefully sanity prevails and the law is struck down.


reply posted on 8-3-2013 @ 02:58 AM by WAstateMosin
reply to post by StrawHatBrian



Um, no offense, but it's the 9th amendment which protects against misinterpretation of the Constitution.

Amendment IX

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

Keep 'em loaded 24/7.


reply posted on 8-3-2013 @ 10:54 AM by StrawHatBrian
reply to post by WAstateMosin



my mistake, i just realized that wasn't in any of the amendments and it was all one gigantic brain fart, yes i know what you're talking about in the IX amendment but i wasn't referring to that, now i have to go and find where exactly i read it.
edit on 8-3-2013 by StrawHatBrian because: it will always be because of spelling mistakes



reply posted on 8-3-2013 @ 11:16 AM by circuitsports










reply posted on 8-3-2013 @ 02:16 PM by FortAnthem
reply to post by Golf66



Its sad to say but, I think the challenge based on how fast the laws were pushed through has a better chance of success.

Like you said, the judges were appointed by the same liberal scumbags who pushed this crap through so they're likely to interpret the constitution loosely to suit whatever their ideological bent may be. It will be harder to wiggle out of the way the bills were passed without debate and in such a rush.

The only problem with this is; the legislature will probably just re-introduce the bills (and probably add in more intrusive garbage they hadn't thought of before) and just pass it all over again after the proper amount of debate time had passed.


reply posted on 11-3-2013 @ 05:58 PM by coltcall
reply to post by FortAnthem



The courts are cutting down Mayor Bloomerpants ban on 32 ounce sodas as we nod in agreement.

One small step for the Constitution.....one giant leap for Americankind.


reply posted on 11-3-2013 @ 07:45 PM by StrawHatBrian
reply to post by MsAphrodite



hahahahaha! woops , sry, sry, right to "bear" not bare, you're right


reply posted on 11-3-2013 @ 07:47 PM by StrawHatBrian
reply to post by MsAphrodite



anyways the first lady looks like she could take down mike tyson
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



UN Proposes Tax On Americans for 3rd world countries
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Armed bystander stops stabbing outside school
  Posted 12 days ago with 27 member flags
" Climate Change Is Not A Hoax", says Obama!!??
  Posted 4 days ago with 21 member flags
Former Arizona Sheriff Mack, ‘Gun Control Against the Law’
  Posted 13 days ago with 12 member flags
Limiting Freedom & It\'s Effects On Society
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags