Reading some of the responses here makes me sad and ashamed.
I don't think anyone can argue the point that Sarah Palin is not the most booksmart person in the country, in fact she is indeed "ditsy". She
however, is certainly in some good company in that regard as alot of politicians and pundits these days are not exactly rocket scientists themselves.
Instead of taking jabs at the woman whom by your own admission is no longer politically of import and is just a person, why not pay attention to the
It is a FACT that the government has purchased 2 billion rounds of ammunition in a little over 1 year.
It is a FACT that some of these were hollow point rounds which are good for only 1 thing and that thing is not target practice.
It is a FACT that the DHS has requested the order of the non-traditional paper targets and that those targets depict average American gun owners in
residential settings. I mean come on, targets of elderly, pregnant, and young women and/or children is totally inexcusable and unacceptable.
It is a FACT that in response the MSM has gone into damage control trying to make what she said seem like a joke and pulling much the same tactics as
some people here (demonizing the person and making the message seem unimportant).
Yet here we are, lobbing insults and disregarding the facts that have been presented attacking the messenger instead of demanding the answers as to
Sarah Palin is not the smartest woman ever, and comes off a little too preachy when talking about religious beliefs but she would be no worse then
the complete morons we have been stuck with for the last 20 years. She has one thing that 90% of them do not have and that is a soul. So have your
fun, best get your teasing in while the teasing is good, because if the SHTF I can guarantee nobody will be in any position to laugh at anybody.
Who am I to try and point out that which should be obvious?
edit on 3-3-2013 by Darkphoenix77 because: clarification
edit on 3-3-2013 by Darkphoenix77 because:
edit on 3-3-2013 by Darkphoenix77 because: (no reason given)
edit on 3-3-2013 by Darkphoenix77 because: (no