The word is, we're going to N.Korea!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 12-5-2003 @ 10:30 PM by dragonrider
The M16A2 itself, one of the best, also. Posted by Mac223

Have you ever actually shot one???

The last time I shot a selective fire M-16 (which incidentally convinced me to NEVER own one) I experienced 5 failures to feed and 2 failures to extract, and one round stuck in the chamber: My only recourse at that time was to spray liberal amounts of break free down the bore and in the ejection port, hold the action handle back and slam the butt on the ground (very dangerous thing to do with a live round stuck in it, but what else are you going to do?) After 4 blows, it finally came loose and I handed it back to the owner.

Imagine that happening in middle of a firefight!

Not to mention the fact that the 3 round burst fixture gives it an exceedingly gritty and crappy 3 stage trigger pull that makes it very hard to hit your target even at modest ranges (on a range without the target shooting back no less!)

By contrast, the AK-47 that the NKs are armed with can be dropped from a plane, run over by a tank, buried in mud and sand, and dumped in salt water, and still come up firing, and will continue to do so as long as there is ammunition in the magazine. The thing is damn near indestructible and DOES NOT stop shooting!

As far as the M4 carbine, I have posted about just how anemic the 5.56mm cartridge is, and from the stubby 14 inch tube of the M4 (especially when stoked with the heavy 62 gr NATO round at reduced velocity), you are putting your life on the line with the ballistic equivalent of a .22 Hornet, with a max effective range of no more than 100 meters.

I'll take my M1A 7.62mm thank you very much.

As for the M1 Abrams, yes, its a great tank, as long as the computers dont go down. If the computers crap out, you can no longer fire the main gun (or run the engines).... You are then a very large sitting target.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^