It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON — In a closely watched patent case, Supreme Court justices appeared ready to dash the hopes of an Indiana farmer who claimed the unfettered right to plant the next generation of Monsanto Co.'s genetically modified soybeans.
The justices strongly suggested in oral arguments Tuesday that they would agree with Monsanto that its patent protection covers not just the first planting but also seeds that are generated later from any plantings.
"Why in the world" would any company invest millions of dollars in creating a new seed if a farmer could buy one and freely reproduce it, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. asked.
Mark Walters, a lawyer representing Indiana farmer Hugh Bowman, argued that a patent holder "exhausts" his rights after selling the product.
Launching a lawsuit against the very company that is responsible for a farmer suicide every 30 minutes, 5 million farmers are now suing Monsanto for as much as 6.2 billion euros (around 7.7 billion US dollars). The reason? As with many other cases, such as the ones that led certain farming regions to be known as the ‘suicide belt’, Monsanto has been reportedly taxing the farmers to financial shambles with ridiculous royalty charges. The farmers state that Monsanto has been unfairly gathering exorbitant profits each year on a global scale from “renewal” seed harvests, which are crops planted using seed from the previous year’s harvest.
Originally posted by Hopechest
Why don't the farmers just use seeds that aren't manufactured by Monsanto?
That's the part I'm not understanding.
snip>Currently, up to 85 percent of U.S. corn is genetically engineered as are 91 percent of soybeans and 88 percent of cotton (cottonseed oil is often used in food products).snip>
With the help of a nonprofit called the Public Patent Foundation, organic and other farmers who do not wish to plant GMOs filed a lawsuit against Monsanto, the world's largest seed company and the holder of numerous GMO seed patents. The company is notorious for suing those farmers when their non-GMO crops become contaminated by GMOs growing in nearby fields. And the organic and non-GMO farmers hoped the suit would protect them from any litigation in the event that their crops become contaminated against their knowledge via drifting pollen or cross-pollination from bees. The lawsuit represented over 300,000 farmers, most of whom were represented by the Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association.
Originally posted by Tardacus
How do even patent a plant or a seed?
They didn`t invent plants or the seeds the plants create, plant`s have been growing wild long before anyone even set foot on the north american continent.
Even though they may have modified a plant that doesn`t give them the right to patent it because they didnt create anything new and they sure didnt create the original plant.
I just wouldnt buy their plants or seeds, see what good their patented plant does them if nobody buys it.
Just buy seeds for the original plant, you know the plant that they used to do the modifications to, obviously that plant isn`t patented because they were free to modify it.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by Tardacus
How do even patent a plant or a seed?
They didn`t invent plants or the seeds the plants create, plant`s have been growing wild long before anyone even set foot on the north american continent.
Yes they did "create" it. They genetically modified it to be resistent to many different things that a normal soybean doesn't have. Right or wrong, that breed of seed is technically no longer natural and is created in a laboratory.
Even though they may have modified a plant that doesn`t give them the right to patent it because they didnt create anything new and they sure didnt create the original plant.
They did create a new seed.
I just wouldnt buy their plants or seeds, see what good their patented plant does them if nobody buys it.
Just buy seeds for the original plant, you know the plant that they used to do the modifications to, obviously that plant isn`t patented because they were free to modify it.
See above and also note that the heavy inclusion of GM soybean is so prevalent that finding an organic seed is becoming increasingly rarer and rarer.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
reply to post by Hopechest
Sometimes I wish we had a judge that would say, "Look, I know there really isn't a law making it illegal for your GMO crops to contaminate non GMO crops. You're guilty because your being ass-hats and just plain dirty."
What Monstanto is doing is nothing sort of ecological warfare. I for one view their cross-polination of non-GMO crops as an enviromental disaster similar to an oil spill.
Originally posted by aboutface
Hear hear. That was tried in court though, but Montsanto (and not logic) won. I wish they could go back and repeal decisions like that. It goes against the common good.