posted on Feb, 19 2013 @ 12:44 AM
On February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11
truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation
(BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.
Over the last 16 months, BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they showed in September 2011 as part
of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On’. Formal complaints were
lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating requirements
of BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public. This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate
Yes siree, and hopefully the issue with the BBC broadcasting that WTC7 fell, way before it actually did, will be brought up in that case. Cause that
has never been satisfactorily explained to my mind. I still think it was planned, and screwed up on the BBC's part, indicating their potential
complicity in the grand scheme.
Rooke has been charged with a crime for not paying his TV Licence Fee. However, he has lodged a legal challenge to this charge and has now been
successful in being granted an appearance in a Magistrate’s court, where he has three hours available to present his evidence to defend himself
against the charge. Tony has put together a formidable team to support him in presenting the evidence, including the following two outstanding 9/11
Professor Niels Harrit
To name a few, but there are others, and they all have more descriptions. Visit links for more info.
The evidence about 9/11 that will be presented by the various individuals above has rarely, if ever, been seen in any court of law in the
United Kingdom, so this court case represents a unique and valuable opportunity for the 9/11 Truth movement.
Excellent! Who knows, maybe they'll get lucky and get an impartial judge, who will side with the defendants- if the evidence presented holds enough
water, that is. Cause just about everything I've seen from the BBC involving 9/11 smells of coverup. Just like all other MSM, for that matter.
If by some miracle he were to win this case, and it was shown that the BBC DID misrepresent facts and mislead the public on some of the 9/11 issues,
to me it might open up a whole new can of tasty prosecution morsels, and set a base precedent. That precedent could then be used to start a massive
I rarely call for flags, but this might be one of those times, folks- to help spread the message about this court case to truthers in the UK who'd
like to show up for support. Or perhaps just to be aware and follow up. Would be GREAT if an ATS member over there could get involved, and give us the
edit on Tue Feb 19th 2013 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)