Originally posted by fireyaguns
reply to post by stars15k
I for one don’t care that you continually interrupt almost every thread to do with geo engineering which is the subject. dont forget. Dont be afraid to use the word GEO ENGINEERING AERALSOLE GEO ENGINEERING.
OK - so prove something about that then??
I don’t know why you insist on the word chemtrail like as if you have a glitch though.
That would be because conspiracy theorists have used the word to describe the hoax for 10-15 years or so....only changing recently because gthe term is getting a bad name as known BS....and rather than admit that they have been duped they change the name - thus extending their abbility to believe nonsense.
This comment of yours (“find one science fact you are told about "chemtrails" and challenge it here”) Well it is impossible because science is mostly evolution and evolution is lie.
While evolution may be science, there is a lot of science that is not evolution.
Atmospheric science - how clouds form, and yes how contrails form, has nothing to do with evolution.
So whether or not you believe in evolution is irrelevant to whether or not ther are "science facts" about chemtrails.
And since "science" bought you the electricity, computer and internet that you are using to writeon here I think you should rethink about it all being a lie.
other things science has brought you: Phones, television, motor cars, firearms, table cutlery, clean water, cleaner air, the buildings you live and work in, air conditioning, insulation, fresh fruit and vegetables all year around, etc....
Explain how a science fact about "chemtrails" has changed to "suit the agenda."
My instinks tell me you know the answer
So why not tell us specifically what it is that is the single most convincing evidence that chemtrails exist??
edit on 18-2-2013 by Aloysius the Gaul because: fix quoting