posted on Feb, 9 2013 @ 05:40 PM
Originally posted by thetiler
The ANSWER (which MOST will just plain out refuse to believe ) is that this underground civilization that nasa MUST be in contact with (probably after
the Lonnie Zamora sighting in New Mexico on April 24th, 1964. When the possible leak came out with Richard Doty contacting Linda Moulton Howe. When
they originally thought the contact was in 1971 at Holloman AFB. It was actually a day after the Lonnie Zamora sighting on the 25th of 1964, at
according to Linda's recollection at 6 pm in at H.A.F.B.
Why do I say they MUST be martians, Because earlier that day, Gary Wilcox on a NY Farm was communicated to by two martians outside their OVAL craft,
JUST LIKE THE CRAFT THAT LONNIE ZAMORA SPOTTED ON THE SAME DAY ! HELLO!!! Both little men with suites on from head to toe. Just like was told to
Ernest Norman that they are the ancestors of the chinese race. They have to wear goggles because they LOST their resistance to earth's sun. When a
solar flare hit mars. Question: were would WE humans go if a massive solar flare hit earth and we had to go underground? Even Machio Kaku STATED
that we would have to were goggles if we were underground for long periods of time and have to go above to do things.
Why say 'Must' ,your stating fact on events there are no facts for beyond eyewitness testimony.
The Gary Wilcox case is hardly identical to the Zamora one, the description of the craft dont match, Gary Wilcox after all doesnt really say if it had
landing legs or not, wheres the symbol on its hull like the Zamora object? if it was the same or similar craft it would have landed the same and the
emblem would have been visible the same as it was for Zamora. Why did the Gary Wilcox craft launch with a quite rumble but no roaring flame like the
Zamora craft... also given the horrendously inaccurate prediction the Wilcox aliens gave, I wouldn't trust anything the little buggers said...
including their planet of origin. And im not bashing any of those cases since I think the Zamora one is genuine and still think the Wilcox one is
So your saying NASA 'MUST' be in contact with underground martians because of two unrelated (beyond the date they happened) UFO encounters where in
one the occupants say they are from Mars... the leap of logic and then pinning of such strong conviction is staggering. Then to say all the proof for
aliens on mars is out in the open but because of how they do things it all looks natural rather than manufactured and its our fault if we cant see
that is a cop out.
And what has the Holloman AFB account have to do with Mars?.. especially when its been retooled 7 years earlier to coincide with the Zamora
encounter... not to mention the Holloman Aliens are polar opposite to the beings seen in the Zamora and Wilcox encounters.
Lost resistance to earths sun?.. um if their from Mars our sun is their sun too. You dont loose resistance, you might become more sensitive to bright
light after being in artificial light for a long time, wait wouldnt these technically more advanced aliens have the ability to make sun bright UV
light sources or pipe in sunlight from the surface of Mars, after all its hardly brighter than earths... so why would they become light sensitive in
the first place even living under ground? they arent wandering around in the dark for crying out loud... or id assume they wouldnt be, or am i placing
to much intelligence in these beings ability to problem solve.
And Wilcoxs aliens where in a complete one piece including covering their faces, so how can you say they were wearing goggles or attribute them to
other similar beings?
And your 'related to chinese' bit obviously is in some way connected to the Droppa Stones, which is a complete load of bunk...
edit on 9-2-2013 by BigfootNZ because: (no reason given)