posted on Oct, 30 2004 @ 10:53 AM
Originally posted by Odd
So it's okay to imprison thousands, just so long as they don't agree with you?
I think I understand liberals now!
That’s very good Bevis or is it Buthead? Just looking at your Avatar, I don’t follow the show so I will go with Buthead, you seemed to have learned a
new word I’m impressed, not so hard after all is it Buthead?
What do you think George Bush would say to your comment above?
After you have formulated your idea of what George would say try and see if it could be applied to your newfound word.
and nowhere in my post above mentions any thing about imprisoning thousands, unless I missed it
As to seeing anyone getting the death penalty, I would wish that on no one. But I believe it is a necessity to help abate violent crimes to mankind,
Originally posted by Mokuhadzushi
This thread is totally serious, no mud fight.
What penalty would a mass murderer who is responsible for the killing of more than 100.000 innocents, mostly women and children incur under, say texan
law ? Could it be argued in his defence that he was mentally ill at the time he ordered the murder (i.E. he believed the neocon WMD garbage
intelligence), or would such a defence strategy be futile ?
This is a moral and legal question at the same time.
Not all people have the same morals true, but I think on the world scale as the average morals of the world that this type of crime would warrant the
Death Penalty, but can these crimes be proven? We can see them but the Courts do not, Justice is Blind.
And if any of these Neo-Cons do go down I seriously think they will never see jail they will give one or two weaker Neo-Cons up on a platter for the
masses to consume and quietly go back to there scheming, and America feels vindicated
[edit on 30/10/2004 by Sauron]