It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(Phys.org)—Dean Keith Simonton, a psychology professor at the University of California, has published a comment piece in the journal Nature, where he argues that it's unlikely mankind will ever produce another Einstein, Newton, Darwin, etc. This is because, he says, we've already discovered all the most basic ideas that describe how the natural world works. Any new work, will involve little more than adding to our knowledge base.
Read more at: phys.org...
Originally posted by ShaeTheShaman
oh now they know it all lol. this guy has no future i guess
Originally posted by ldyserenity
reply to post by XPLodER
I know why too, it isn't because people won't have the genius, they just don't want to be robbed of their ingenuity by large corporations and die in a hole destitute while some big wig takes the credit!
Originally posted by zedVSzardoz
Everything we know in science is about less than .000005 of everything there is to know according to any scientist worth his diplomas. Then here comes this psychologist and feels so content that he was born to the "lucky" generation that had all the answers.
WE ARE RETARDED! we have a loooong way to go before we can even hold on to a THEORY for a couple decades anymore about anything before new information rewrites what we thought we knew in light of new discoveries.
This is a huge problem I have with book smart people. They lack ALL imagination and so lack vision into what COULD be.
I will say it again......WE ARE RETARDS....all of us. There is plenty of room for progress......LOTS..We dont know jack.
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by XPLodER
Soon all inventions will be done by Artificial intelligence.
Not only that but as capitalism and its dog eats dog mentality collapses there will be no more financial incentive for invention, all that will remain is the internet which will remember who made what and when for an eternity.
Originally posted by solomons path
reply to post by XPLodER
Let's put this in some context shall we before everyone starts running with "they think we know everything" which hunt against science, as is so prevalant on this site, shall we.
The article is not saying we know everything and there is nothing left to discover. He claims that the basic framework for all of the sciences has been laid . . . we've discovered the basic principles, so anything new is going to add to exisiting fields (say dark energy/matter).
He also states he's been working with/studying genius for 30yrs, and his position is also based on the changing paradigm of research. Now, we no longer see a lone-wolf "crazy" scientist researching in private to come up with new ideas. We now work in large teams working a project and any new breakthroughs will be the work of teams and not some exalted "genius".
He also goes on to say he "hopes he is wrong on this issue", but his findings lead to that conclusion.
But . . . let's run with the hyperbole, cuz Jersey Shore attitude towards scientific articles is more fun than examining it with critical thinking.
EDIT - the article also didn't say that we wouldn't label humans as genius, just the superstar-type icons (Einstein) are a thing of the past.
Comprehension, people . . . please! Deny Ignorance, right?edit on 1/31/13 by solomons path because: (no reason given)