What did Hitler know about how to reach the sheeple?

page: 2
7
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 30 2013 @ 04:41 AM
link   
Hitler planned to produce the first "True-TV"-program. Everyday life of a German family, shown in movie theaters.




posted on Jan, 30 2013 @ 04:12 PM
link   
Hitler never won the election? He was installed. Only 20% of people in Berlin voted for Hitler, they thought he was a clown. Hitler was ruthless - read about the Night of the Long Knives, he killed his own leaders to make a deal with the German army leadership. He also probably suffered from untreated syphilis. A history channel special documented his irregular heartbeat. Total ruthlessness, a powerful propaganda machine, and a severe depression were the reasons Hitler came to power. Once he was there, dissenters were killed. He probably murdered his own niece, over his sexual obsession with her. So we have a man who was a homosexual prostitute in Vienna, who murdered his relatives and associates, and probably was going mad from untreated syphilis, lead to the deaths of 60 million humans.



posted on Jan, 30 2013 @ 04:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Matt1951
Hitler never won the election? He was installed. Only 20% of people in Berlin voted for Hitler, they thought he was a clown. Hitler was ruthless - read about the Night of the Long Knives, he killed his own leaders to make a deal with the German army leadership. He also probably suffered from untreated syphilis. A history channel special documented his irregular heartbeat. Total ruthlessness, a powerful propaganda machine, and a severe depression were the reasons Hitler came to power. Once he was there, dissenters were killed. He probably murdered his own niece, over his sexual obsession with her. So we have a man who was a homosexual prostitute in Vienna, who murdered his relatives and associates, and probably was going mad from untreated syphilis, lead to the deaths of 60 million humans.


The parallels between him and Bush are just absolutely uncanny....



posted on Jan, 30 2013 @ 04:32 PM
link   
All your points are fine, if politically biased. I mean, it's obvious where you stand just based on your answers here. You ought to at least try to get past the tired olf GOP vs Dems here is your accusations. I think you are missing a vital point here. Hitler was probably the best German-speaking orator who ever lived. Most of us cannot appreciate that because we don't speak German, but the guy was good. Indeed, during his career, before he became Chancellor, his personal characteristics put him at odds with others in his party, even to the point of throwing him out. But you know what he did when they did that? He just sneered at them and said, "They need me." And sure enough, Hitler was reinstated to become the "spokesman."

Now sure he wasn't the only one who knew how to manipulate the "sheeple." It's not a particularly erudite issue. "We're gonna get those 1% ers and those Wall Street money grubbers, by God" is what won the last election--not any attention to the issues.

Hitler took those oratorical skills and enthralled the German people by mesmerizing them with his rhetoric. We don't have anyone today who compares. Obama stutters through his speeches without a teleprompter. Republicans like Boehner and McCain are just plain boring, real eye-rollers. Kennedy was okay, as I remember, but Teddy Roosevelt was fantastic! He was also the most popular US President ever.

Rhetoric does not measure the character of a person and it is a piss-poor reason to elevate anyone to exalted status, but the fact is that a good speaker like Hitler or Roosevelt could move the masses in an extraordinary way.



posted on Jan, 30 2013 @ 09:06 PM
link   
reply to post by HopSkipJump
 


There are certain similarities, although Hitler was a far better speaker.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 05:06 AM
link   
Hitler was installed, not elected. Note Nazi public support was falling at the time, they were losing seats in the Reichstag.
secondworldwar.co.uk...
This lays to rest the false idea Hitler was a mesmerizing speaker who hypnotized the German public. Really, watch him, he looks like/was a buffoon. Once he was dictator is was easy to create movies (Triumph of the Will) or stage mass rallies. Many dictators do this. Kind of like a young Republican convention, or Kim Jong Il.
Hitler was a syphilitic homosexual man whore/murderer/buffoon. He believed in astrology/demonology. His whole concept of Aryan people came from a Russian woman pulp fiction writer. Reporters from a Munich newspaper (later murdered by Hitler) were on to him and were exposing him, so Hitlers popularity in Germany was falling at the time he was installed as Chancellor.



posted on Jan, 31 2013 @ 05:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Hefficide

I'll fix the economy. I'll bring the jobs back! I'll take that Diane Fienstein out back and personally spank her before sending her back to California in shame! I'll repeal Obamacare on day ONE and cut entitlements so that only those trying to get a leg up will get a hand out! Elect me and I will make America GREAT AGAIN!"



I'll probably get shred to pieces for saying this but that fear has never stopped me before ...

That sounded like it could be a quote from a Mitt Romney speech ...

I, too see the parallels between the old Nazi state and what America has become today, maybe because many of the United States most successful and influential people supported and/or can be directly tied back to Nazi Germany?
edit on 31-1-2013 by Tazkven because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 04:50 AM
link   
This is a good link, to perhaps the first murder Hitler did with his own hands. It would not be the last.
www.veteranstoday.com...



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 06:21 AM
link   
This is what he knew. I'm sick of lies being spread. He was elected by the people for the people.Do you really believe you would have paid vacations , a 40 hour work week. Those were Hitlers concepts implemented. It s a given now. Lets look at the economy. Its exactly the same as 1932 Germany. This is Wiemar America!

Lets see what Hitlers said about CREATING JOBS. It makes perfect sense yet all of the Democratic and Communist agenda do it ass backwards and place the present economic burdens upon future generations.

1. Unemployment causes poverty, employment creates prosperity. Just as the individual sinks into poverty when he no longer has a job, so also must a whole people sink into poverty when it does not use its productive strength and tolerates a political-economic system that hinders people’s comrades who are willing and able to work to support themselves.

2. Capital does not create jobs, but rather jobs create capital. The “brilliant” capitalist economists maintain that we cannot work because we lack the means. That is nonsense. The less we work, the less must be our means, and the greater the unproductive waste and destruction of our national resources. The more we work, the greater our capital, and therefore the greater the results of our labor.

3. Unemployment benefits burden the economy, but job creation stimulates the economy. Tolerating unemployment means: With less labor, less is produced, and therefore less can be consumed. The result: hunger, poverty, and wage cuts. The fewer who work, the fewer who pay taxes, To get the same tax revenues, therefore, individuals must bear a heavier burden. The result: tax increases. Decreasing purchasing power and increased taxation forces more firms into bankruptcy. The result: an increase in unemployment. The unemployed must be supported by the community, which means an increase in public expenditures. The result: the collapse of public finance, despite an increase in taxation. Contributions to the unemployment fund decrease, while poverty forces more to depend on it. The result: collapse of the unemployment compensation system, despite increases in contributions and cutting of benefits. Private industry collapses under the increased burdens. Small firms become bankrupt. Independent people are ruined. Big capitalist firms, trusts, etc., are rescued by the state, since their collapse would throw hundreds of thousands of people into poverty. Billions go for rescuing banks, hundreds of millions for supporting the big industrial and shipping concerns. All of these sacrifices are useless. Unemployment, poverty, and deficits have to get worse, the general situation ever more hopeless, as long as there is not a complete change. Only a systematic program of job creation can bring that change. If public means are no longer wasted, but rather are used to create jobs, our labor will no longer be wasted, but rather used productively, which will result in improvements everywhere: an increases in production, increased purchasing power, reduction in taxes, a general improvement in the economy. Today we are wasting our resources, but this policy will lead to the formation of new capital. National Socialism will ensure that this new capital belongs exclusively to those who have created it through their labor and sacrifice.

4. Working people cannot be satisfied with meager unemployment benefits. Working people demand the right to a job. Tolerating unemployment means a brutal deprivation of rights for the productive people’s comrade. He is robbed of his freedom to earn his living by his own efforts. He is robbed of the ability to support himself, and is forced to rely on miserable public support, which is constantly being cut. The working people does not want to sell its right to life for these few pennies, but rather demands the right to work. We National Socialists are in the forefront of the battle for the rights of working people. That is why we were the first to proclaim this right, and to have proposed a job creation program.


Makes complete sense, but because he said it. It has to be wrong. LOL Wiemar America, Wiemar Britain Wiemar Canada etc etc
Here is what he said about the banks and HOW TO CORRECT IT. NOT BURDENED BY IT.



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 06:21 AM
link   

1. Bank supervision The problems with today’s private banking system are clear. Bank presidents receive hundreds of thousands in pay for their supposed vastly important work; each member of the board of directors, which usually meet only once a year, often receives tens of thousands. The responsibility of bank presidents and boards of directors is shown by the fact that the state had to pay 1 1/2 billion marks for their foolish speculations and bad investments. Bank presidents do what they want, and the state pays the bills. We therefore demand that the banking system and the money and capital systems be nationalized, just as the railroad and postal systems were fifty years ago, when under Bismarck’s leadership the transportation of persons, goods, and communications were taken under state control. As a result of the state support since July 1931, through which the Reich covered 1 1/2 billion marks of foolish speculation on the part of the big banks with tax money, more than half of the German credit bank system is already in the hands of the Reich. As preparation for the nationalization of the banking system, we demand the right of the state to supervise and intervene, and a requirement that banks report to the state. The supervisory capacity must give the state the possibility of fully understanding everything that happens in the banking system, and the right to intervene must make it possible to introduce measures in the banking system that are in the interest of the economy. The reporting requirement will insure a monthly statement on all positions and important changes. Only these measures will make it possible to stop foolish investments. Only they will make it possible to reduce interest rates to the necessary degree and break the slavery of interest. And only these measures can create the foundation for financing the job creation program. Furthermore, the head of the Bank Office will have the authority to make the organizational changes he thinks necessary to prepare for and implement the nationalization of the banking system.

2. The money transfer system Germany is behind in the cashless transfer of money. In England checks have become widely accepted. In America, children learn how to fill out a check in school. We demand a significant expansion of the money transfer system, in particular of the Reich Bank and the Post Office banks, as well as the systems of the other credit banks. We further demand legal protection for cashless money transfers, as already exists in other countries, so that he who writes a check or transfers money at post office banks or Reich Bank branches without having the necessary funds in his account will be severely punished. Postdating checks or transfer orders will also be punishable. Postal checks will have a convenient size. An expansion of the money transfer system will help eliminate the shortage of currency in circulation, and also concentrate the money within the economy, as has happened in England, and which has contributed to the leading role of the London financial market. This will also increase the credit basis for job creation. The expansion of the money transfer system will also make the overall financial situation clearer and decrease the cost of money transfers.

3. Reducing interest rates The charging of interest has lost its purpose when it devours, or even exceeds, the profits of production. In the latter case, the productive capacity itself, and therefore the jobs, are destroyed. Current interest rates have had that effect. There are significantly higher than during the pre-war period of prosperity. And it is obvious that a healthy economy can bear higher interest rates than one that has collapsed. A comprehensive state control of the entire banking system must eliminate this situation and reduce interest rates to a point where productive capacity and jobs can be maintained and increased. The objection that this is impossible can be answered by saying that it is absolutely necessary. Besides that, the Brüning government has already worked to reduce interest, although to an insufficient degree, without the consequences that were predicted. If interest rates are not reduced, production will cease entirely, which will put an end to interest, with the result that inflation will once again occur, savings will be lost, and the people and government will sink into chaos.


This is exactly what all of us have been screaming about. BAILOUTS. lol Wiemar America
What a concept. The banks controlled by the State, Government, the people!!
Not by a bunch of crooks having a circle jerk party.
I smell World War 2.



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 06:21 AM
link   

H. Administrative and tax measures
1. Price controls Wages, salaries, and private income are part of national income. The degree to which it is a part consists on the one hand on the amount of the wages, salaries, and private incomes, on the other hand on the price of goods. If the price of a good is raised above the appropriate amount (cost of production plus a reasonable profit) because of a cartel or the presence of a monopoly of some sort, the purchaser must pay an unjustifiably larger part of his share of the national income. This is always socially unjust and economically dangerous. State price controls, therefore, must insure that large deviations from appropriate prices are prevented (fertilizer prices, salt prices, radio tubes, etc.). Objection: This is a harmful intervention by the state. Response: If prices are reasonable, state intervention is unnecessary. And the freedom of creative economic activity must not be confused with the freedom to ruthlessly exploit others.

2. Avoiding excessive expenditures To provide the funds for job creation, the state must exercise the greatest economy, just as in private industry. Party book officials, who do nothing for the general good, and who waste public resources, must be eliminated. Administration must be simplified, respecting the well-earned rights of the professional civil service. Expenses for prestige projects must be radically reduced. This includes limitations on the use of government automobiles, etc. As long as cities do not have enough funds for welfare payments, they should not spend a penny for ceremonial activities. Unnecessary expenses must also be eliminated in private industry. Board of directors honoraria must be eliminated.

3. Increasing the burden on those with strong shoulders No one will believe that jobs can be created without sacrifice. But the sacrifices need to create jobs cannot randomly be added to all the other burdens laid on working people. All the sacrifices are simply evidence of the fact that the economy is collapsing, and getting worse. Sacrifices to create jobs will lead us out from collapse and to freedom. We will be sure that the sacrifices that have to be demanded will benefit working people (see section D 3: The pay deductions from purchasers of single family houses must not enrich capitalists, but rather increase the property of the worker himself. In the same way, state subventions will enable workers to gain property more easily, or to enable policies that are in the interest of the whole economy or that guarantee our people’s food supply). Moreover, we will be sure that the heaviest sacrifices are not demanded from the poorest and neediest. For the duration of the crisis, sacrifices should come from those who are best able to bear them: Those with high incomes over 500 marks monthly must be a surtax for job creation. High earners of over 15,000 marks annually will pay a correspondingly higher tax. For civil servants, the highest annual pay will be fixed at 12,000 marks. (This will not be a permanent change in the salary scale, but rather will be effective only for the duration of the current crisis.) Salaries in private industry will be similar to those of the civil service, taking into account the fact that such employees do not have a pension, and have less job security. The growth of those with two incomes must be completely prohibited.

4. Eliminating corruption Civil servants may not participate in any way in companies with which their offices have business relations. Doctors may have no connections to pharmaceutical factories and other concerns that manufacture medications or health products. The death penalty for black marketers and profiteers.


Absolutely Correct. There are your reasons for World War TWO as instigated by Britain, France And America.
September 3RD 1939 not September 1st. BS
On September 1st.after years of Polish BS and ten days of Britain and France playing cat and mouse. 80,000 German refugees fleeing Danzig. Atrocities unheard of against the German people for months previous. Civilian Passenger airplanes being fired upon by Polish antiaircraft at least 3 times. What the !@#$% did you expect him to do?? 3 days later at least 5000 German men ,women and children slaughtered, genitals removed,eyes gouged out, heads smashed with rifle butts.Bromberg Bloody Sunday.
Would you sit on your hands listening to Donovan records and naively flashing a peace sign, or would you step in to stop the merciless slaughtering of your countrymen by rolling tanks across the border into Poland?

Sept 17 1939. Russia invades Poland. What did Britain and France do for their Polish Buddy?
Nothing!!!
edit on 1-2-2013 by Mister1k because: addition



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 06:27 AM
link   
Although Common sense is hardly common.Even sheeple have Common Sense.
By 1935, 6 million back to work and the other 65 million their quality of life exceeded any an all nations on the planet. BAD BAD Germans. LOL
edit on 1-2-2013 by Mister1k because: additional comment



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 08:18 AM
link   
German people voted many times and let their will noted. They wanted to get rid of multi-party government. The leader-principle was just what the public demanded. The first years were triumphant by any measure point.



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 10:49 AM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


What an excellent breakdown of the dynamic!

People are much more likely to follow someone they feel they can relate to. The stuff that went on before his speeches were what we now refer to as "performance art".



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 12:13 PM
link   
He was never elected. Show us one valid reference. Look here:en.wikipedia.org...
Hindenburg 53%, Hitler 36%.
"Although Hitler lost the presidential election of 1932, he succeeded Hindenburg as head of state only two years later, when Hindenburg died in 1934. After the president's death Hitler abolished the office entirely, and replaced it with the new position of Führer und Reichskanzler ("Leader and Reich Chancellor"), cementing his dictatorship."
He lost the election.
edit on 1-2-2013 by Matt1951 because: (no reason given)
edit on 1-2-2013 by Matt1951 because: incorrect link



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 12:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Matt1951
This is a good link, to perhaps the first murder Hitler did with his own hands. It would not be the last.
www.veteranstoday.com...

Here is the correct link
www.henrymakow.com...

I had the wrong link pasted.



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 12:20 PM
link   
Hitler had nothing to do with the forty hour work week.
en.wikipedia.org...
edit on 1-2-2013 by Matt1951 because: incorrect link
edit on 1-2-2013 by Matt1951 because: missing words



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by YetSharkproof
German people voted many times and let their will noted. They wanted to get rid of multi-party government. The leader-principle was just what the public demanded. The first years were triumphant by any measure point.

Total rubbish.



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 12:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mister1k

H. Administrative and tax measures
1. Price controls Wages, salaries, and private income are part of national income. The degree to which it is a part consists on the one hand on the amount of the wages, salaries, and private incomes, on the other hand on the price of goods. If the price of a good is raised above the appropriate amount (cost of production plus a reasonable profit) because of a cartel or the presence of a monopoly of some sort, the purchaser must pay an unjustifiably larger part of his share of the national income. This is always socially unjust and economically dangerous. State price controls, therefore, must insure that large deviations from appropriate prices are prevented (fertilizer prices, salt prices, radio tubes, etc.). Objection: This is a harmful intervention by the state. Response: If prices are reasonable, state intervention is unnecessary. And the freedom of creative economic activity must not be confused with the freedom to ruthlessly exploit others.

2. Avoiding excessive expenditures To provide the funds for job creation, the state must exercise the greatest economy, just as in private industry. Party book officials, who do nothing for the general good, and who waste public resources, must be eliminated. Administration must be simplified, respecting the well-earned rights of the professional civil service. Expenses for prestige projects must be radically reduced. This includes limitations on the use of government automobiles, etc. As long as cities do not have enough funds for welfare payments, they should not spend a penny for ceremonial activities. Unnecessary expenses must also be eliminated in private industry. Board of directors honoraria must be eliminated.

3. Increasing the burden on those with strong shoulders No one will believe that jobs can be created without sacrifice. But the sacrifices need to create jobs cannot randomly be added to all the other burdens laid on working people. All the sacrifices are simply evidence of the fact that the economy is collapsing, and getting worse. Sacrifices to create jobs will lead us out from collapse and to freedom. We will be sure that the sacrifices that have to be demanded will benefit working people (see section D 3: The pay deductions from purchasers of single family houses must not enrich capitalists, but rather increase the property of the worker himself. In the same way, state subventions will enable workers to gain property more easily, or to enable policies that are in the interest of the whole economy or that guarantee our people’s food supply). Moreover, we will be sure that the heaviest sacrifices are not demanded from the poorest and neediest. For the duration of the crisis, sacrifices should come from those who are best able to bear them: Those with high incomes over 500 marks monthly must be a surtax for job creation. High earners of over 15,000 marks annually will pay a correspondingly higher tax. For civil servants, the highest annual pay will be fixed at 12,000 marks. (This will not be a permanent change in the salary scale, but rather will be effective only for the duration of the current crisis.) Salaries in private industry will be similar to those of the civil service, taking into account the fact that such employees do not have a pension, and have less job security. The growth of those with two incomes must be completely prohibited.

4. Eliminating corruption Civil servants may not participate in any way in companies with which their offices have business relations. Doctors may have no connections to pharmaceutical factories and other concerns that manufacture medications or health products. The death penalty for black marketers and profiteers.


Absolutely Correct. There are your reasons for World War TWO as instigated by Britain, France And America.
September 3RD 1939 not September 1st. BS
On September 1st.after years of Polish BS and ten days of Britain and France playing cat and mouse. 80,000 German refugees fleeing Danzig. Atrocities unheard of against the German people for months previous. Civilian Passenger airplanes being fired upon by Polish antiaircraft at least 3 times. What the !@#$% did you expect him to do?? 3 days later at least 5000 German men ,women and children slaughtered, genitals removed,eyes gouged out, heads smashed with rifle butts.Bromberg Bloody Sunday.
Would you sit on your hands listening to Donovan records and naively flashing a peace sign, or would you step in to stop the merciless slaughtering of your countrymen by rolling tanks across the border into Poland?

Sept 17 1939. Russia invades Poland. What did Britain and France do for their Polish Buddy?
Nothing!!!
edit on 1-2-2013 by Mister1k because: addition


More neo-nazi rubbish.
en.wikipedia.org...

You certainly select a queer and murderous tyrant to idolize.



posted on Feb, 1 2013 @ 02:48 PM
link   
I really enjoy this thread. There actually are neo-nazis floating around. Reminds me of the German soldier in the movie "The Producers". I have now insulted their Fuhrer.




new topics
top topics
 
7
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join