It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Feinstein Releases List of Guns Demanded to be Banned.

page: 10
36
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 26 2013 @ 03:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by restlessinMT
OK I am going to finally post to a "gun" thread!

Here it is folks or at least my opinion... I am all for more extensive background checks and limits on clips but that is it! It comes down to all gun owners raising their awareness to keeping what they have out of harms way!


edit on 1/25/2013 by restlessinMT because: (no reason given)


Limits on magazines makes no sense. First of all it violates the "Shall not infringe" clause. A 10 round magazine can be changed very quickly, like 1 second fast. Limits like these do nothing to prevent crime. Someone could do more damage with a 1 ton pickup, or a can of gas if they are really determined to cause trouble. What we should be asking is why these things happened so rarely in the past, and what has changed in our society to cause them now. As they say, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
edit on 26/1/13 by JAK because: Code correction for page distortion,



posted on Jan, 26 2013 @ 03:38 AM
link   
reply to post by paranormal78
 


Being in California, you say there is a rising crime rate.

Yet california has an assault weapons ban. These thugs. Where did they get the assault weapons they are using if they are banned in your state? Your own post is mild evidence that an AWB is pointless. because those thugs are willing to violate the laws and get those weapons.

I know you want to believe we can make a difference. But you need to accept the reality that criminals commit crime. (DUH) and they will get their hands on weapons.

Answer me, why can't we persecute the criminal for using their weapon instead of persecuting the owner for having the weapon for his or her defense.

You can ban assault weapons all you want. Hell, they've been banned for a whole 25 years and change. But those same criminals are still using full auto Mac 10s. Nothing has stopped them from getting them, and nothing we do short of proactive border enforcement will.



posted on Jan, 26 2013 @ 08:59 AM
link   
reply to post by Miraj
 


Only wanna be gangsters are using legal semi guns anyhow. Items like this are availble with no checks and ship straight to your door.

www.gunbroker.com...

A little welding and cleanup is all thats required to have a Full Auto UZI etc.. Kits like this generally sell for about a $1,000 which is like a half days pay slinging rock!

There are literally 10's of millions of these parts kits in country and they come in just about any flavor of weapon you could want. The last assault weapons ban saw a massive influx as suppliers sought to keep their profits on par with pre ban times. Instead of converting the guns to semi auto and selling them with checks they just cut up the full auto guns to meet ATF specs and shipped em in. Once cut they are no longer considered a firearm.

Most kits do not come ready to go like this, and require much more work.
edit on 26-1-2013 by Donkey_Dean because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2013 @ 11:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by ArnoldNonymous
Why is an AR .22lr on the list? Because it looks like a more dangerous weapon? Come on, if they plan to ban that why don't they say all .22lr semiautomatic guns.

Maybe they should consider banning AR airsoft guns. Those are scary too! Take all the boomerangs and butter knives as well


I still can't believe she is in office.


I'm with you on asking WHY they want to ban the .22LR AR variant, but I think it could easily be re-chambered for 223 and 5.56



posted on Jan, 26 2013 @ 11:19 AM
link   
reply to post by T4NG0
 


Let me explain this to some of you who dont want to accept the truth.

The Founding Fathers of the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Articles of Confederation, and the US Constitution all warned in various writings that our freedom down the road could be taken away by continual trading of rights for more security, and they warned of a person one day on a white horse who would promise everything while being a tyrant to the people.

The Modern American Left, and Progressives, and Socialists, and the USA Communist Party all advocate for taking away peoples guns. Their argument because they live in so called safe enclaves is that only police and the military have a need for guns. And some of them have other agendas in gun control. If the people dont have guns, then the government forces can do anything they wish to the people.

Observe Cuba, the former Soviet Union, the former East Germany, North Korea, and China, and more. The populace of those countries have no means to defend themselves with firearms, the governments are oppressive to the people.

Barak Obama is on record on video being interviewed back before he became president that he doesn't like our current constitution. He states that it is a negative bill of rights because it doesn't include what the Government CAN DO for the people. He has stated he would like a new constitution one day. As has Hillary Clinton and others in high profile positions.

Automatic Weapons have been severely restricted since the 1930's. You can purchase a fully automatic if you pay the high fees for such clearance and pass the background checks. Yet this is not offered to hunters or everyday people. Automatic Weapons are for the military, police, and select individuals granted the right to have them.

Semi-Automatic weapons may be purchased by anyone who today can pass a simple background check.

Automatic means you pull the trigger once and the entire clip or magazine fires away until empty.

Semi-Automatic means you have the pull the trigger independently with each round of fire. EACH BULLET

Be careful of falling into the trap of believing that Semi-Automatic weapons should be taken away from people, of which in your mind you are thinking solely of Ak-47 type weapons. Understand there are Politicians and certain Groups who would like to take All Guns Away.

By definition if you can just simply pull the trigger, bang bang bang bang bang bang until the gun is empty, solely by pulling the trigger alone. THAT IS SEMI-AUTOMATIC WHICH INCLUDES EVERY TYPE OF HANDGUN CLIP MAGAZINE OR REVOLVER ON THE MARKET.

The only guns by definition that are not semi-automatic are bolt action rifles, and pump shotguns. Because they require an independent force to reload before the trigger mechanism will work.

The gun control advocates are attempting by various means and measures to eventually disarm the entire American Populace, and make buying Ammo so expensive that normal people cannot afford it.

And you need to look deeper into their reasons for why.



posted on Jan, 26 2013 @ 05:54 PM
link   
i see Stephen King has jumped on the Anti Gun band wagon ,another Hypocrite who makes money out of violent ,blood thirsty entertainment



posted on Jan, 26 2013 @ 05:57 PM
link   
reply to post by T4NG0
 


That list is much too long and complicated for my pretty little head. How about we ban Madame Feinstein instead?



posted on Jan, 26 2013 @ 07:43 PM
link   
reply to post by davolobos
 


Sorry to detract from your otherwise, well written post, but you stated that:



THAT IS SEMI-AUTOMATIC WHICH INCLUDES EVERY TYPE OF HANDGUN CLIP MAGAZINE OR REVOLVER ON THE MARKET.


When in fact, there are many styles of SAA, or Single Action Only revolvers which can not be considered semi-automatic. As you must pull the hammer back before the weapon can be fired...

Other than that, though....Carry on!....







edit on 1/26/2013 by GoOfYFoOt because: n



posted on Jan, 26 2013 @ 07:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by eXia7

Originally posted by ArnoldNonymous
Why is an AR .22lr on the list? Because it looks like a more dangerous weapon? Come on, if they plan to ban that why don't they say all .22lr semiautomatic guns.

Maybe they should consider banning AR airsoft guns. Those are scary too! Take all the boomerangs and butter knives as well


I still can't believe she is in office.


I'm with you on asking WHY they want to ban the .22LR AR variant, but I think it could easily be re-chambered for 223 and 5.56


Not "re-chambered", but simply press two pins out, and swap out the entire upper to whatever caliber you want!
With just a mag change and possibly the buffer spring....

Currently there are around 50 different calibers that you can get the standard AR-15 chambered for. And a dozen or so more, for the AR-10....

This is why they want to ban the AR in .22 long rifle. The lower is the same for over 4 dozen rounds....



posted on Jan, 29 2013 @ 02:49 PM
link   
I'm not sure if this has ever been brought up before on ATS but although what happened in Waco, Tx was just a case of Janet Reno and her co-jerks 'jumping-the -gun" as it were!
Although the Branch D's were 'out there and strange' the FBI stated they were raiding it because of the use of illegal non-registered fully-automatic machine guns! What they found after the BBQ'ed all those people were legal semi-automatics and a few fitted with plastic (and this is important) ATF APPROVED devices that clip on the trigger guard and has a crank, when you turn the crank a small oblong disk rotates and pushes the trigger enabling you to fire it very fast (but not very accurate)
They have since (in some areas,) quietly restricted their sale, here is a link to one:
www.tacticalinc.com...
This was a simple case of the FBI caught with egg on their face (just like Ruby Ridge) and they will ALWAYS try to call those they kill 'terrorists', 'crazies'. 'outlaws', etc. they make up the laws to cover their screw-ups
They murdered these people and got away with it!!
edit on 29-1-2013 by wulff because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2013 @ 08:32 PM
link   
reply to post by wulff
 


Yeah for sure Waco was really bad. I was too young to watch it live or anything. Basically thats how a gun grap would go down though.



posted on Feb, 5 2013 @ 05:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by T4NG0
reply to post by wulff
 


Yeah for sure Waco was really bad. I was too young to watch it live or anything. Basically thats how a gun grap would go down though.

For sure, what these incompetent idiots thought would happen is the whole country would see them quickly overrunning a terrorist organization and 'rescuing' the people but in a comedy of errors they opened Pandora's Box and with the whole world watching a small group hold off the likes of our modern military they had to finally knock it down without regard to the 'members' and tried to blame it on the cult members setting the fires and dying in a dramatic suicide 'pact'! I think everyone knows now the people inside tried to protect the women and children but the fires along with the tear gas prevented them from escaping (very convenient as the dead tells no tales).
The problem is I think they learn a little more from each of these attacks on US citizens so when it comes time they will do it with 'slightly' more efficiency (meaning they will kill quicker and have some enemy of the state to blame BEFORE they start!)
Thanks for your reply and insight.



posted on Nov, 22 2013 @ 04:25 PM
link   

T4NG0
This is a pretty big list consisting mostly of rifles that are classified as pistols,(so fun), full size assault rifles, as well as magazine loaded shotguns like the Saiga 12. I for one feel this is a direct violation of the constitution, and should be shot down immediately, no pun intended.

HERE is a link to the original article.

Her hypocrisy knows no bounds.



Doesn’t that tell us something? That people in government are not really for the people? I said are you telling me a fit, you are having a fit because some of the moms of the shootings are really frenetic against guns and well that may be true. Does tell us something that government is not out for the ways of the people who poured the concrete for the nation.

You have to drill holes in the top of Feinstein’s head. You have a ukele you can play on top of Feinstein’s noggin?

I don’t see how it is real to have a celebration on freedom (Ar’s are bad cooped in.) Ar’s are cooking pots.

Vote, get them to change the laws and don’t let them mess with any.) Is Congress fancying itself as stupid as it can’t tell what an amendment is or why we need them.

And please don’t make me give up my Schmidt lighted clock!
edit on 22-11-2013 by MarkScheppy because: add



posted on Nov, 22 2013 @ 04:30 PM
link   
Can someone please explain to me why you need an assault rife to shoot a deer?



posted on Nov, 22 2013 @ 04:33 PM
link   

okiecowboy
reply to post by restlessinMT
 

just a quick question...
How does a more extensive background check work? How would that help anything ?
If a criminal wants a gun...he knows he can't pass a background check....think he will still try and do the paper work? Nope he will find another way...normally get a buddy that can pass a background check to buy the gun for him..

And by clips i assume you mean magazines? If i am carrying 100 rounds of ammo with me...what doez it matter if it is in 3 magazines or 4 or 5? This whole bs theory that someone can jump a shooter while changing mags
Is crazy....go to youtube and watch a few videos of mag changes...
The ONLY thing these laws do is get them started banning stuff....SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!


Should I go and contact Chuck Shumer or Grassley and tell them to molly up the grapes, so I can have grapes.

I think that we have been into the culture for too long that we are not sure what the government and these people who say ban guns are really doing. This country is nutts. The only time you ever hear a politician saying anything is when they are saying don't. Will smith google the names of the guns.

The Feinsteins are lousy we need now to get more people that are real laws that are not this ban this. Feinstein’s go up into a tree and cry. Cry us a river about guns and violence, guns don’t kill the people pulling the trigger do though.

Does anyone see what this is? Feinstein hit the road. We modified the constitution and disses we are getting dissed.



posted on Dec, 23 2013 @ 04:39 PM
link   
reply to post by T4NG0
 


But what prison would you put the people who are there? Hands and feet anything can be deadly if the person knows what they are doing. Karate and judo those can turn into some kind of vicious weapon but most of the time, not nothing can some one compare to a gun or rifle especially in the hand of a good marksman or someone who has a lot of mean. Freakin jail time for the average person who wants to own a firearm, come now. We are heading towards a society that looks like a version of the stasi.The guns of semi-autos those are real for people who use them for gun training or for self protection, I am thinking that more and more this is making us accept the dumbing down of our rights under a new government.

Feinstein,“I don’t make excuse but that is pretty much what happened."



posted on Dec, 23 2013 @ 05:19 PM
link   
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
 


I can, but before I do, I would like you to explain how shooting a Deer is relevent to the second admendment.



posted on Dec, 23 2013 @ 06:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Urantia1111
 


Save the Republic we are more than the home shopping network and the home shopping buy a bunch of crap club.



posted on Dec, 23 2013 @ 08:22 PM
link   
reply to post by buddhasystem
 


I can barely walk 100 ft without getting winded,but I bet I would be a nightmare if I went operational.
There is a page by Bob Owens describing a rebellion.I have this stupid Mac style mouse and can't copy over.
edit on 23-12-2013 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
36
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join