It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thunder57
This might be a better way, I found a law passed by New Hampshire back in 2009 called HCR-0006, It is really good and precise for what we all need right now. It might be something we can send to our more gun friendly congressmen and women to help get the ball rolling to make a change in our respective state laws before it is to late to do anything about it. Here is the law: www.gencourt.state.nh.us...edit on 23-1-2013 by thunder57 because: (no reason given)edit on 23-1-2013 by thunder57 because: (no reason given)
That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:
I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.
II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.
III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.
IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.
V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.
VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually.
Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government; and That copies of this resolution be transmitted by the house clerk to the President of the United States, each member of the United States Congress, and the presiding officers of each State’s legislature.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Now I'd LOVE to see it all simplified at the Federal Level as the last estimates I saw put total gun regulations in the United States over 25,000 combined down to local levels.
Yeah..I do agree with the 10th ...as it's necessary to maintain and not actually RESTRICT the rights as they stand by Super Court decisions on the federal level.edit on 23-1-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Source
Possess without permit: class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in prison, a fine of up to $1,000, or both
Possess loaded firearm without permit, outside of person's home or place of business: class C felony, classified as violent felony offense, punishable by up to 15 years imprisonment, with a mandatory minimum of 3.5 years
N.Y. Penal Law §§ 265.01, 265.03, 265.20
Originally posted by randomname
then why are automatic weapons banned.
an automatic rifle meets the definition of a type of arm.
since they are banned to most americans without jumping thru several federal loops, the right to bear that arm is being infringed upon by it's type.
since the law is in the books, it would lead any rational person to believe the federal government of the united states can do anything it wants as long as its justices are bought and paid for.
i.e. there is dirt on them, just like everybody else in government.
Let's take another example and here is a real good one that actually happens often enough to truckers to be mentioned in some training I had while working. New York State is among a couple known to freely ignore and violate the provisions of the Interstate Transportation of Firearms.
18 USC § 926A - Interstate transportation of firearms
Notwithstanding any other provision of any law or any rule or regulation of a State or any political subdivision thereof, any person who is not otherwise prohibited by this chapter from transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm shall be entitled to transport a firearm for any lawful purpose from any place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm to any other place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm if, during such transportation the firearm is unloaded, and neither the firearm nor any ammunition being transported is readily accessible or is directly accessible from the passenger compartment of such transporting vehicle: Provided, That in the case of a vehicle without a compartment separate from the driver’s compartment the firearm or ammunition shall be contained in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console.
Originally posted by randomname
then why are automatic weapons banned.
an automatic rifle meets the definition of a type of arm.
since they are banned to most americans without jumping thru several federal loops, the right to bear that arm is being infringed upon by it's type.
since the law is in the books, it would lead any rational person to believe the federal government of the united states can do anything it wants as long as its justices are bought and paid for.
i.e. there is dirt on them, just like everybody else in government.
Originally posted by exitusstatuquo
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I notice you mention city gun bans. That seems to be where the most abuse of power lies. The City of Washington D.C. for example has had its gun ban put down by the supreme court not long ago did it not?