posted on Jan, 22 2013 @ 10:05 PM
Originally posted by Tw0Sides
What I find Ironic, is you forget who Obama was running against, As you Fully Supported Him.
Originally posted by sonnny1
I find this highly Ironic. Americans also are Anti-War, but had no problem reelecting Obama, who has stepped it up with covert wars..........
Romney made it Perfectly Clear, the Day after getting Office, Iran was Under Attack.
Obama made it Clear, Lets try Talk, and Sanctions.
See Sonny, the US people, dont want War.
And since the two parties are working under the same master plan, I think the difference in the candidates was to let the pentagon know if they could
conduct an open war... or do a shady PR campaign to make it look like we are trying to sit back and observe until we are just dragged into it.
Either way... war will still go on.
... but no, the people don't want it... so they will try to keep it on the back burner.
just because the back burner is in the back, doesn't mean it gets any less hot.
I hoped there was a difference too... but look at Syria.
How can Syria help Iran when Iran gets attacked by Israel when Syria has enough of it's own problems. that is their idea. Multiple nations are also
able to start trying to control weapon routes near Syria due to this conflict... but it's to help prep for war with Iran and protect Israels borders.