It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Taikun
Another Gulf of Tonkin incident waiting to occur? I will not rule out a false flag from the Chinese this time around, for a full scale military grab for the islands. U.S. will join Japan, where Russia will back China. A world war in the making.
Originally posted by cass1dy09
China traded more with Japan then the US in 2012. All though 45 years worth of oil under those Islands are a good enough reason to battle.
www.chinadaily.com.cn...
Originally posted by Bone75
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by Bone75
Wow... what a time to take away our assault rifles huh? If I can't trust my government to pay their debts with my money to keep our economy going, why should I trust them to protect my family if an international coalition invades us.
We're not exactly "popular" right now if ya know what I mean. That's why I'm keeping my weapons.
What international coalition has the naval power to invade mainland America? Please tell me the strength of their navies vs the strength of the US Navy. I can save you the trouble if you'd like. Every nation in the world does not have the naval power to do so. The only countries which could invade us would be Canada and Mexico.
Do you really think we're the only people smart enough to pull something like this off?
What do you think a few of those could do to our Navy?
The U.S. has forces specific to this region that would be capable of handling any Chinese threat.
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by Kashai
First China floats boats and then a jet and the west is up in arms. Elements of US reserves then routed to region and arms sales spiral to Asian "allies".
If China and Russia had a pact to spread Americas defenses thinner around the world, that would be one way to accomplish it. And all they had to do was a "flyby".
Pretty smart. The result is less resources available for any upcoming Middle East push. They guarding some "islands" off Japan.
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by SplitInfinity
The U.S. has forces specific to this region that would be capable of handling any Chinese threat.
Famous last words.
Edit: Whoops, this is a argue war thread... my bad
I'm out.
edit on 13-1-2013 by intrptr because: additional...
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by Kashai
First China floats boats and then a jet and the west is up in arms. Elements of US reserves then routed to region and arms sales spiral to Asian "allies".
If China and Russia had a pact to spread Americas defenses thinner around the world, that would be one way to accomplish it. And all they had to do was a "flyby".
Pretty smart. The result is less resources available for any upcoming Middle East push. They guarding some "islands" off Japan.
Deployable Battle Force Ships: 283
Ships Underway (away from homeport): 124 ships (44% of total)
On deployment: 104 ships (37% of total)
Attack submarines underway (away from homeport): 30 submarines (55%)
On deployment: 20 submarines (37%)
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by SplitInfinity
The U.S. has forces specific to this region that would be capable of handling any Chinese threat.
Famous last words.
Edit: Whoops, this is a argue war thread... my bad
I'm out.
edit on 13-1-2013 by intrptr because: additional...
Compare US forces in the Pacific with the Chinese naval forces. Then let me know what you think.
Originally posted by intrptr
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by SplitInfinity
The U.S. has forces specific to this region that would be capable of handling any Chinese threat.
Famous last words.
Edit: Whoops, this is a argue war thread... my bad
I'm out.
edit on 13-1-2013 by intrptr because: additional...
Compare US forces in the Pacific with the Chinese naval forces. Then let me know what you think.
Already been done. Not by me either. You're depending on carriers and they are obsolete as far as new sub technology and smart mines, missiles, both land and sea based. Carrirers are LSTs (Large Slow Targets). They can be overwhelmed the way bush men used to overwhelm elephants. They shoot a 1000 arrows into them. The elephant stomps and trumpets but eventually is overcome.
Here... read it for yourself.
Generally Speaking
Now I'm out.
As the aircraft carrier battle groups advance, China draws out one of its "trump cards" by leaking to the world media that it is dumping its holdings of US Treasury bonds and shifting to gold and euros.
The assassin's mace: China's anti-satellite weapons
Glee and ecstasy soon turn to shock as monitor screens suddenly go blank. Then all communication via satellites goes dead. China has drawn its second "trump card" (the assassin's mace) by activating its maneuverable "parasite" micro-satellites that have unknowingly clung to vital (NORAD) radar and communication satellites and have either jammed, blinded or physically destroyed their hosts.
This is complemented by space mines that maneuver near adversary satellites and explode. Secret Chinese and Russian ground-based anti-satellite laser weapons also blind or bring down US and British satellites used for C4ISR (command, control, communication, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance). And to ensure redundancy and make sure that the adversary C4ISR system is completely "blinded" even temporarily, hundreds of select Chinese and Russian information warriors (hackers) specifically trained to attack their adversary's C4ISR systems simultaneously launch their cyber offensive.