Please look at this photo and tell me what you think

page: 13
35
<< 10  11  12    14  15 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by larphillips
 


It looks like a small dull gray metallic object to me. Many of those being reported lately.




posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 01:38 PM
link   
good find looks liget but im sure people will come up with bs about what it really is.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 01:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Staroth
reply to post by larphillips
 


It looks like a small dull gray metallic object to me. Many of those being reported lately.

Yeah -- but a lot of those objects that people say look metallic up up being birds, like this one:




posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 01:52 PM
link   
It's one of the ships from my home planet Aloria located in the Cygnus A galaxy. Just kidding, Probably a bug or bird close to the camera and it appears as though it is behind the tower.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 02:00 PM
link   
Thats one strange bird.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 02:43 PM
link   
reply to post by larphillips
 


Good pic. Could be a number of things. I am gonna guess a model plane or drone.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 04:00 PM
link   
Things can look very odd when you catch a still image of something in motion. That being said I believe in both pictures what we are looking at is a bird in motion.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 04:18 PM
link   
reply to post by larphillips
 


So this 190 foot tall cell tower has a wooden telephone pole attached to the top of it?



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 04:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Cynicalhope
 


Please read the whole thread.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by tinhattribunal

Originally posted by Human_Alien
And you take photos of cell towers..............why?


it' takes a whole lot of physical effort to climb poles and towers!
if you can get the job done from the ground your ahead of the game.

and while we're all lookin at pictures ...


from india!


Looks a little tramped.

I still can't make out what it is but the bird evidence is compelling.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 05:21 PM
link   
I hope you have better luck asking that question that I did. I asked the same thing, was accused of photo manipulation. . .called a liar. Mostly by those who failed to read the entire OP. It was a fruitless effort.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 06:03 PM
link   
reply to post by larphillips
 


Hi why does one site claim the embedded data in the photo was (c) 2011 when the picture was taken in 2012?
Just curious..
Limbo

www.davidicke.com...

Below is the EXIF data of the camera used;

Camera Maker: SAMSUNG
Camera Model: SAMSUNG PL210, PL211 / VLUU PL210, PL211
Image Date: 2012-07-25 10:15:18 (no TZ)
Focal Length: 36.2mm (35mm equivalent: 201mm)
Aperture: f/5.6
Exposure Time: 0.0020 s (1/500)
ISO equiv: 80
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: program (Auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB
GPS Coordinate: undefined, undefined
Copyright: COPYRIGHT, 2011
Software: 1101205

Someone was asking for EXIF data;

Also the setting;

Focal Length: 36.2mm (35mm equivalent: 201mm)
Aperture: f/5.6
Exposure Time: 0.0020 s (1/500)
ISO equiv: 80;



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 06:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by LightOrange
reply to post by Outrageo
 


Nice post


I considered the non-flapping interval and went searching for a photo of a bird so I could get on photoshop and do some testing of the bird theory. All I did was one smudge and a little blurring and voila:

edit on 9-1-2013 by LightOrange because: (no reason given)


I wondered hy I thought the image in the picture appeared to have a "tail."
Limbo



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 06:40 PM
link   
reply to post by larphillips
 




Seems a little too symetrical and non-organic to me... but maybe it's more of a "want it to be true" than reality.


maybe, but understand some 'want' it to be a bird...



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 06:42 PM
link   
reply to post by sweord
 





maybe, but understand some 'want' it to be a bird...

I want it to be an Alien spaceship but unfortunately it is a bird , no point pretending otherwise .



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 06:57 PM
link   
reply to post by gortex
 





I want it to be an Alien spaceship but unfortunately it is a bird , no point pretending otherwise


well, i wasnt talkng about you then was i?



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 07:08 PM
link   
reply to post by sweord
 


He's just pointing out that you can't make something else of something that isn't.There's some evidence to conclude it is a bird though.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 07:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Dutcheagle
 





He's just pointing out that you can't make something else of something that isn't.There's some evidence to conclude it is a bird though.


none of that changes the fact that there are people who WANT to see a bird just as there are people who want to see a UFO.



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 08:40 PM
link   
Bird,mmm Birdy,Birdy Birdy.



I like the "Blurfo" term can be applied to same many things. Hopefully also make it simple for those that can't grasp what they're seeing. Unless they just don't wan't a simple earthly explanation
edit on 10-1-2013 by Nola213 because: (no reason given)
edit on 10-1-2013 by Nola213 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 08:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by JesusChristwins
reply to post by LightOrange
 


Man the photographer who took the picture of the bird manage to make it look so clear because it was moving with a low speed. How can a bird of this size fly so fast that a camera cant catch it?


You're joking, right? Chickadees are very fast little buggers. A shorter shutter speed on a camera is used to take pictures of moving objects. A company that takes photos of still-standing objects would set their camera to a rather long shutter speed.

Be realistic, please. You honestly think it is more likely that it's an alien spacecraft than a bird? Come on.





new topics

top topics



 
35
<< 10  11  12    14  15 >>

log in

join