Originally posted by Nevertheless
This gets funnier by the minute.
People invent a ridiculous claim, call it a conspiracy.
If the police dismiss it, then it's evidence that there is a conspiracy.
What about THIS post don't you understand?
www.abovetopsecret.com...Originally posted by pheonix358
Originally posted by sconner755
Originally posted by pheonix358
This is just silly.
I have listened to the recording of the Police comms and quite clearly they gave the details of the car's plates and this guy was given as the owner.
The Police here are not putting this to bed, they lit a match under the mattress!
How can they be this thick!
It's not the police who are being thick.
Quite clearly the Chris Rodia traffic stop was an unrelated situation. The police confirmed again today that the car belonged to a member of the Lanza family.
Rodia had nothing to do with Sandy Hook. To continue to drag him through the mud, based on nothing but your own conjecture and incorrect conclusions, is totally not cool.
Well la de da! The Police checked a license plate, gave us the owners name and, wait for it, .... the car is at the scene being towed away from the crime scene. Now who is being thick!
So here we have PROOF that this car thing is NOT an unrelated traffic stop. You gonna believe the lies the police tell or you gonna believe the proof right in front of you. Ya can't make this stuff up folks.
I'll play the devils advocate. Show me in light of this proof above why it's wrong and not valid.How could this possibly be incorrect?
edit on 4-1-2013 by JohnPhoenix because: addition