It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zonetripper2065
No guns for anyone, unless they're for protecting the rich people.
go to helledit on 25-12-2012 by zonetripper2065 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sconner755
reply to post by bknapple32
So then it stands to reason that anybody who has a job that could affect national security, like a computer programmer for the Air Force, should have their children protected by armed guards too.
But then the children of garbage collectors shouldn't need armed guards to protect their kids. Some kids are worth protecting, some aren't.
I bet every parent thinks their own kids are worth protecting though.
Originally posted by oper8zhin
or=skyblue]So its [color=gold]GOOD and RIGHTEOUS REASONING for THEIR CHILDREN [color=skyblue]to be protected via ARMED GUARDS with firearms in THEIR CHILDREN'S SCHOOLS, but all of a sudden its [color=gold]BAD, BAD, BAD, when its suggested as a solution for MASS SHOOTINGS IN OUR CHILDREN'S SCHOOL??!!
Am I understanding this correctly???