Father Robert E. Weiss knew 10 of the CT shooting victims, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 24-12-2012 @ 04:41 AM by Sek82
No, I doubt he was an actor.

Was he witness to the events at the school?

This student, for example. Actor or not, listen to her account where she claims nothing even really happened. Kids weren't really screaming, maybe kinda crying. Lockdowns are scary for kids.

She mentions nothing about a shooting.
Must have been a big, soundproof school to not hear the hundred plus rounds of gunfire, right?

This was the first interview I happened to see that day. It set the tone for me. a murky, stinky tone.

Nothing has added up since, except that this had been one heck of an event with a very clean casualty collection point outside the school.

By the way, that student who didn't hear any shooting... Let's try again to see if she saw or heard anything in a different, earlier interview when specifically asked if she heard gunshots about 40 seconds in.
Did she deflect from the question?! I think she did! She must be an ATS member.

Sorry for the bad quality of that last one, YouTube has since removed the good quality versions from users along with Facebook in their actual, not a conspiracy, censorship campaign.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
These outright lies and attention seeking antics are disrespectful to those that died and to those that are mourning.
That's original and new.





edit on 24-12-2012 by Sek82 because: added time reference, remove a line or two, etc...



reply posted on 24-12-2012 @ 05:00 AM by SubTruth
reply to post by Chadwickus



I believe so many people question this because they are what I like to call searchers. A searcher to me never really plants any roots in anything from religion to relationships. There minds search for truth and answers but never really find any.



Facts don't really even factor into it very much when your mind wants to tear everything apart. Conspiracy sights and religious sights is were they tend to flock to. In the ever widening search for answers they will cast aside.



I have personally known a couple and they bounce from religion to religion and relationship to relationship.



reply posted on 24-12-2012 @ 05:21 AM by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by Hellas



It's actually a German name that many Jews have, but there are just as many Christians with that last name...so I still fail to see your point

What does a German name that people of various religions share have to do with the content of the OP?
edit on 12/24/2012 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 24-12-2012 @ 05:22 AM by Sek82
reply to post by SubTruth

That's an interesting theory, about the searching bit. Some of us seek what we call "Evidence". It's required in order to claim a "Fact". Facts, contrary to propagandiated belief, differs from a "Report".
edit on 24-12-2012 by Sek82 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 24-12-2012 @ 05:29 AM by Aesir26
reply to post by Corruption Exposed



So is "Gene Rosen", an Ashkenazic Jewish name meaning, "of the rose", as in "Rosicrucianism":

For what we do presage is not in grosse,
For we are brethren of the Rosie Crosse;
We have the Mason Word and second sight,
Things for to come we can foretell aright.

— Henry Adamson, The Muses' Threnodie (Perth, 1638).


reply posted on 24-12-2012 @ 09:27 PM by Druid42
reply to post by Chadwickus



Hate to do this to you Chad, but I pulled up the .pdf church bulletins for the week of Dec. 9th, Dec. 16th, and Dec. 23rd. CHURCH WEBSITE!

The 9th's bulletin had nothing. Of course, the shooting was on the 14th. The 16th's bulletin had nothing in it either, related to the shootings. The 23rd's Church Bulletin?

A photog cover, nicely done.

A vague reference to the tragedy:


and a Brief mention of the school:


To me, this doesn't sound like a parish that lost 8 of their kids and 2 of their adults.

I don't know, should be a bigger write up on the lost members of their parish. Read the .pdfs yourselves. They are not very descriptive or informative, just bland church related functions. Above all, they should be acknowledging the loss of their parishioners, but no mention of them in the 23'rds Bulletin. I find that to be very odd.


reply posted on 25-12-2012 @ 07:37 PM by Chadwickus
reply to post by Druid42



This is as tenuous as all those "experts" claiming to know how a parent will react when their child is murdered...

Seriously, because the church notice board doesn't cover the event enough, this, in your opinion proves that the victims didn't go to church? That Father Bob is fake?

Really??


reply posted on 25-12-2012 @ 08:01 PM by Druid42
reply to post by Chadwickus



I have no idea if you are religious or not, but when a "church" loses a member, it's posted in the weekly bulletin. When a church loses ten members in one tragedy, there should be an obvious indication of that.

At LEAST a page write up, commemorating those lost. Don't the poor kids that belonged to that parish deserve at least that?

From what I've presented, this parish was lax. I'll withhold further speculation in respect of those lost.



reply posted on 25-12-2012 @ 08:06 PM by Chadwickus
reply to post by Druid42



Perhaps the church has been too busy consoling the families to spend enough time on the paper?

Who knows but I'm not going to speculate how or why a church paper isn't as comprehensive on a topic as it should be. And I'm certainly not going to use it as a reason to justify a conspiracy theory!


reply posted on 25-12-2012 @ 08:18 PM by Human_Alien
Originally posted by sconner755
Originally posted by kudegras
I think common sense needs to prevail, I know this is a conspiracy site but enough is a enough.
28 lives were lost, mourn their loss but dont devalue their loss by constantly seeking a conspiracy, these kids and teachers had family and friends who I am sure do not want to read that they dies in some Government setup.
This is the last Sandy Hook post I will read, and it is one that is asking you to stop.



Just so I understand.

You believe accepting the OS that a crazy kid acted alone because he was crazy somehow values the lives of those dead more than being skeptical?

What I believe is those who are so offended by the skepticism for one reason or another find comfort believing in authority figures.

I think it dishonors the victims more when the government demands that we accept their "official" version of facts as truth or else face a prosecution at the point of their guns.



You are so out of line. Do you think we're morons, because we don't see this the way you do, is that it?

Do you not realize how many of us are Truthers and took part in the 911 Movement? Do you not think we don't question authority? Do you think we're choosing this because it's too hard to fight it? Is that it? So if we don't see a conspiracy we're by default, pushovers or shills, is that it too?

Like I suggested to someone on another thread, you think you got this down? You think you figured this out? Then do a service to this country and tell someone instead of anonymously tapping behind your keyboard on a forum.

And by the way, what is the official story? When did it come out because I would like to read the report. Please make a thread, okay?

To the others: I truly think this is an age thing. The younger they are the more they're convinced they're right.


I hope Springer closes these threads and ban some of the members.


reply posted on 25-12-2012 @ 08:37 PM by Druid42
reply to post by Chadwickus



Like I originally said, I hated to bring it into your thread. It stands as speculation only. I have too much respect for you as another member to continue this further, but I just had to interject what was, IMHO, an anomaly.

I'm good to let it rest here, till the OS is released.




reply posted on 25-12-2012 @ 09:00 PM by PaperbackWriter
reply to post by Chadwickus



Is it possible for you to find another photo that does not show every single member of the clergy's back?
I don't live there and even if I did, I have no way of knowing what event I am seeing or who the people are
depicted.
It is strange to me that a member of the media was even allowed to photo this scene and makes it a hair
suspect that you can't see their faces, at all.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Norway To Open Century Old Package
  Posted 19 days ago with 127 member flags
Blame The Real Bad Guys - The Powers Behind Super Powers
  Posted 18 days ago with 65 member flags
19 Yr Old Hostage Gunned Down By Police While Escaping Captor
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags
DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags
Police Shoot Another 911 Caller In Her Own Backyard
  Posted 19 days ago with 46 member flags
The Oatmeal\'s Tesla Fundraiser Pushes Past $1.1M
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

My rant about my country.... England
  Rant: 7 hours ago, 42 replies
PROOF 9/11/01 was an inside job
  9/11 Conspiracies: 15 hours ago, 35 replies
I have a new Kitten....
  General Chit Chat: 15 hours ago, 26 replies