reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
Well, I read that there was a study that basically said that in terms of pure intellect, the people of ancient Greece for example, were much richer
in that regard that we are, that our greatest genius would be a mere pleb to the least of them.
What that means in real terms, who the hell knows? I mean, sure, no ancient greek could work an iPad right off the bat, interact with the internet
without having a fit, or play PS3 on first encounter with it. But those things are not measures of intellect, but measures of how well a person has
adapted to a global advancement in what we see as normality.
Also, it is worth noting that the example you give of someone recording a deadly incident rather than helping, is somewhat unhelpful. This is because
morality (which should demand that the witness act to assist the endangered party) and intelligence are not the same, not related, and can exist
totaly appart from one another. I know ignorant cusses who have wonderful moral fibre, and I know people who have deep wit and understanding, who are
borderline psychopaths, who not only would not assist a person in danger, but take bets on the outcome of the scenario as it plays out. I also know
people who are incredibly intellectual, and extremely moral.
One of the falsehoods fed to mankind by its leaders, writers, and journalists, is that intelligence automatically indicates decency and goodness. It
does not.
I am merely interested that inside of a one year period, there could be two such WILDLY conflicting studies performed, which seem to inhabit the same
area of interest, thats all.