posted on Dec, 21 2012 @ 02:35 PM
reply to post by ChristianJihad
Well, you certainly have hot information, regularly.
If your evidence or theory is correct, i.e. more than one shooter, then it is plausible other lone shooter events had more than one lone gunman, as
apparently, it is better to have one sober and one doped up (so to speak). In the Sirhan case (Robert F Kennedy), they believe others were shooting;
JF Kennedy, surely there were; Martin L KIng: The KIng family all are on record that they do not believe James Earl Ray did the shooting (Mock trial
proves Ray's innocence) and Columbine fully reported two shooters.
So there are precedents for the "multiple shooter" theory.
What about President Ronald Reagan and former Beatle John Lennon shootings, could they have had another shooter? What about that Korean who hated rich
white people and English, who was in college at a typical "white, rich college" taking English as a major(minor?), any second with him?
I suppose the "second" could also be a "handler" rather than shooter also, or both. Wasnt there a question did Mark Chapman have help paying for
airfare, in the timeline to shooting Lennon? And John Hinckleys brother having dinner with a brother or cousin of George Bush (same day?), is so far
out coincidence we may as well just place a second shooter or handler with him.
The important thing is: Lone shooters cannot be trusted to carry out missions...?