It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LordGoofus
Yes but see, the people against euthanasia are using the most extreme example, where it is not regulated in ANY way so joe bloggs can walk in off the street, get a need and die.
14. No person is entitled to consent to have death inflicted on him, and such consent does not affect the criminal responsibility of any person by whom death may be inflicted on the person by whom consent is given.
241. Everyone who counsels a person to commit suicide or aids or abets a person to commit suicide, whether suicide ensues or not, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years
Originally posted by LuDaCrIs
somewhere...
How can you possibly distinguish a mentally ill person and a normal person .
Originally posted by LadyV
First let me say..."Dazed and Confused"? Interesting picture under your name there...hmmmmm
I don't think I have heard anyone say it's ok for mentally ill people to take their own life I think it has to do with people with an incurable disease living in pain....
Originally posted by LuDaCrIs
(1) Euthanasia should be bannned.
(2) THis is because u cant distinguish a mentally ill person from saying "i want to die" and a normal person saying "i want to die".
(3) Someone who walks into a clinic and says "i want to die" will be considered crazy either way.
(4) How can u have euthanasia ONLY for people with painful diseases???...who's to say the limit should be there???..
Originally posted by LuDaCrIs
How are you possibly gonna implement such an idea. TO have wat???...."assisted suicide" in a clinic somewhere...
How can you possibly distinguish a mentally ill person and a normal person from coming in and saying "i want to die"
amuk
I cant think of a reason
sminkypinky
That strikes me as horribly wrong and cruel beyond tollerance.
Originally posted by Otts
or if the child were the fruit of rape
should not be used (as in the Robert Latimer case) to put a paraplegic or tetraplegic child "out of her misery".
What I mean to show by this is that euthanasia can be an act of love or an act of weakness.
Originally posted by Enki
Why not require a psychiatric evaluation? There are already ways to determine if a person is legally competent to make decisions. If you can't walk in off the street and get gender re-assignment surgery, why would you be allowed to walk in off the street and be legally euthanized.
Is your only issue with euthanasia that people who are mentally ill might request and receive it?
Originally posted by Nygdan
That strikes me as horribly wrong and cruel beyond tollerance.
But thats quite different. The dog is being killed because it suffers, and similarly a horse is killed when it breaks a leg, but thats because its life isn't valued very much, not merely because it suffers. Often animals are put to death before they are suffering, without an attempt at treatment, or when treatment is too expensive. Its humane, but its humane for animals. For humans, I'd say its a different story.
Originally posted by LuDaCrIs
A psychiatric evaluation!!!....exactly....Wat doctor is gonna say ok....i give permission for this person to die.
ANYBODY THAT wants to kill themselves is going to be considered crazy by a psychologist.
sminkeypinkey
quote the whole line in context please.