It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by VoidHawk
Ahh I failed to see your point, yes we are subsidising the likes of Tesco's with benefit top ups on minimum wage. And it has to stop. Minimum wage should be that of a wage that you can actually live on without any help.
Originally posted by michael1983l
Yes thats right, your read it right, single earner families in the UK with 2 adults and 2 children pay a whopping 73% in tax.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
and they love thier health care system so much they gave it a tribute in the olympic opening ceremonies....
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by VoidHawk
Ahh I failed to see your point, yes we are subsidising the likes of Tesco's with benefit top ups on minimum wage. And it has to stop. Minimum wage should be that of a wage that you can actually live on without any help.
We seem to have lost our way when it comes to wages. We are now taught that we should all "pay our way" through life, and that I agree with, but were also being taught that we shouldn't expect any more than that.
If I work for a company who's profits are in the billions, and I work a full week, then I expect that company to pay me a wage that not only allows me to survive, but also enables me to save money for holidays etc, afford a mortgage and live comfortably.
Sadly I see the day coming where we all have to work and we'll be paid with credits that give us our food entitlement and somewhere to sleep, and nothing else!
We are slaves.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
A slightly for factual article is on this British money/budgeting site
The issue is that as soon as one parent is earning more than £50,000 the system will start to claw back benefit payments through the tax system. For every pound more than £50,000 that you earn (up to £60,000) more and more of the benefit is clawed back.
Accountants Smith & Williamson did the maths for The Telegraph and discovered that everything you earn between £50,000 and £60,000 is effectively taxed at 52% if you have one child. If you have four children it is taxed at a staggering 73%. That means 73p in every pound you earn goes straight to the government. That's far higher than the rate on a millionaire's income - even if he or she pays their taxes!
So for starters you ahve to be earning UKL50k per annum - which is a decent amount.
And the 73% is not the tax rate on the total income - it is the marginal tax rate on earnings from UKL50k to UKL60k
It is pretty weird - but it is a common "trap" when people earning more money start losing govt benefits that are aimed at lesser incomes.
Originally posted by happyzodiac
Has anyone do any reading. Socialism just does not work never will so get out of it.
reply to post by happyzodiac
You are paying more because there are a lot of freeloaders in the UK and other countries that have Socialistic ideas in their government. The US is next and the people here are just as stupid thinking that they will all get free insurance health care. People never learn.
Surplus value and exploitation
Wal-Mart gives a prime example of the great polarization between these two classes. Wal-Mart employs around 1.4 million people in the U.S., and most employees make $7.50 an hour. If every employee worked 8 hours a day for five days a week, Wal-Mart would pay a little over $20 billion each year in wages.
In 2002, Wal-Mart sales totaled $217 billion and their costs were $207 billion (including the wages paid to workers), leaving an additional $10 billion. Where did that extra $10 billion come from? It came from the hard labor of the workers. Instead of going to the workers, it goes into the pockets of Wal-Mart's owners as profit. A basic principle of economics is that labor produces value.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Are your "free" benefits really worth the cost?
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Are your "free" benefits really worth the cost?