posted on Nov, 30 2012 @ 09:31 AM
If this does happen, it won't save our country. Think of this, with all the irrational people, many corporate leaders included, stirring up things,
how can this country be saved. If they don't get their way they will destroy the Economy, does this seem to be a patriotic act? Not to me it
doesn't. The biggest terrorists in this country are those who will destroy this country to gain power, not the common worker. There are a lot of
these people and they are sticking together, creating a situation that will enslave the rest of the public eventually. We will once again be working
all our lives just to survive. If the people who want to run the show get control, bye bye internet. It will be a threat to their future. I see
this as the only way that the USA will become a nation where we lose our freedoms. I doubt if people understand the mindset of these corporate
leaders. They control a lot of stockholders faith, they work by inciting fear into the public because their worthless stock can collapse, stock
without nearly enough real value except for growth potential. Growth potential is based on belief that has been conditioned into the people, belief
that has no basis or reality attached to it.
If people want to believe that these big pushy corporations are going to take care of us look at their history. Have they exported jobs and the execs
raised their salaries to unrealistic figures? Have they further weakened the economy and increased our reliance on them? Have they created big
offices outside this country to protect their businesses? Only half the corporations are like this, you can't judge them all the same. If the
corporation creates a real lot of jobs here for all classes of people, then they may be good. We can't have a welfare nation with half the people
working, we need a job where as many people who want to work can work.
If Republicans would put up a candidate that would challenge those that are trying to seize power, I would vote for them because a lot of the
Republican ideals are good. Seems like both parties are romancing these type of people that give them stockholder money to finance their campaigns.
You don't think those execs are giving the campaigns their own money do you?