It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Hey Maybe you can find some floating objects in this Apollo 15 video? Here's a hint: there aren't any floating objects in this Apollo 15 video!]
Even so, Apollo By The Numbers remains a living document. The author welcomes any suggestions for improving the information offered by this revised version of the published book.
Comments and documented potential corrections may be sent to:
Richard Orloff
Apollo by the Numbers
c/o NASA History Division
NASA Headquarters
Mail Code ZH
Washington, DC 20546
U.S.A.
Originally posted by choos
if you have an issue with the error then you better write to the guy so he can correct it.
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Really choos it's a problem for your side, not ours.
There aren't any floating objects in that video and NASA has tried to hide the fact that the Apollo 15 TV press conference even took place.
You know what that means to the Apollo Investigators? Red flag.
Originally posted by choos
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Really choos it's a problem for your side, not ours.
There aren't any floating objects in that video and NASA has tried to hide the fact that the Apollo 15 TV press conference even took place.
You know what that means to the Apollo Investigators? Red flag.
why is it an issue for my side? because a guy (who doesnt work for NASA) compiled mountains of data in his own time over 12 years, forgot to put in a TV interview??
no floating objects?? you mean apart from david scott bobbing up and down the entire interview? al worden moving up 2-4 inches and staying there for over 20 minutes?? nah no floating objects at all.
the red flag here is seeing the stability of HB.
p.s. im pretty sure there are other things he has forgotten to put in.. perhaps you should comb through the timeline for everything for every mission and find more conspiracies. you know the conspiracy of forgetting thingsedit on 2-7-2013 by choos because: (no reason given)
however, people who were born in that era and were watching it on live TV have.
Apollo Myth has been crushed in this thread. Dead on arrival. NASA is covering up about the Moon. They have been doing it since Richard Nixon was president. You don't know your history choos. And you always underestimate Richard Nixon and the power of mass media brain washing.
so what exactly is stopping them from landing on the moon?
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by choos
so what exactly is stopping them from landing on the moon?
I don't know, radiation?
You'd have to agree that it should be trivial to send a man in a capsule around to loop the moon in 2013. It should be truly trivial. Shouldn't it?
You'd have to agree that in the early years of aviation daring pilots were lining up for the suicide run across the Atlantic Ocean yet not a single human or monkey has been outside the Earth Radiation Belts except for those Apollo astronauts during Richard Nixon's presidency.
It's only natural that we should be suspicious about these things. And the more I scratched the surface of Apollo I keep finding so much BS about it. And it all points to a conspiracy to hide the facts about the Apollo moon missions.
The Apollo radiation dosage per astronaut and the Apollo PRD data will be the key to unlocking this NASA trickery.
Originally posted by choos
Originally posted by turbonium1
The experts I've quoted prove you wrong. They clearly say adequate shielding is needed in the deep space environment.
So, how about you citing these experts who support your claim, that no shielding at all is needed for short-term lunar missions, except in the case of large SPE's?
That should be quite interesting.....
oh no, you caught me out.. i dont actually have any... no wait i do:
refer to 0g/cm2 for aluminium and polyethylene..19 and 20 cGy per YEAR and 120 and 95 cSv per YEAR.. during a solar minimum that equates to about 3.94cSv dose equivalent on the skin for 12 days.
lets see the maximum allowable for 30 days.. hmmm.. on the skin its 1.5Sv.. which means we are about 38 times under the limit.
BFO: 3.12cSv for a 12 day mission the limit for 30 days is 0.25Sv.. which mean we are about 8 times under the limit.
cant believe you brought this back up so quickly hahahaha