Disclosure of the moon landing hoax.

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter

Apollo Myth has been crushed in this thread. Dead on arrival. NASA is covering up about the Moon. They have been doing it since Richard Nixon was president. You don't know your history choos. And you always underestimate Richard Nixon and the power of mass media brain washing.

since when?? you have not brought a single piece of evidence to the thread in 60+ pages to prove the apollo myth.

you have only written about your own theory.. your theory that von braun masterminded a 40+ year master plan to expose aliens (which could incidentally last another 1000+ years which ever is more convenient).

so what is stopping apollo from happening? i dont even think you know, because sometimes you acknowledge they can go to the moon and sometimes you dont.

p.s. i cant believe you are saying showing the moon landing on TV proves the conspiracy.. can you even imagine if they decided to do what you want?? can you imagine peoples reaction if they didnt televise it? damned if they do damned if they dont.. you twist everything into a conspiracy.. even forgetting things proves conspiracies now. you better watch out, apparently they asked overloadskeptic if they want to be a government contractor.. OMG CONSPIRACY ON YOUR DOORSTEP.


p.p.s. they have been watching emails too.. the internet is the spawn of the evil CIA.. why are you still using the spawns of satan? (i know i shouldnt feed the trolls).

reply to post by choos


Are you claiming victory in this thread choos? Well that is totally absurd. 64 pages of NASA excuses is not a victory.

Poor Charles Bolden has to protect the Nixon lies about Apollo. That's why NASA has Keep Out Zones on the moon. That's why no president has ordered a moon mission since December of 1972.

I am not blaming Charles Bolden for this. But he has his job to do. To protect Nixon's Apollo.

And Bolden will continue to do this until the Asteroid Swarm wipes out every Apollo landing site on the moon. Once the sites are wiped clean... Nixon's Apollo can finally come to an end. Do you challenge this historical interpretation? If you do, then I would kindly ask you to produce the credible and empirical data with regard to individual Apollo astronaut PRD data for every Apollo mission.

The NASA cover up has been smashed. It's over.

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter


you see.. thats how you deal with the moon landing conspiracy.. non of your theories have held any weight, you have provided ZERO proof or evidence to show that NASA faked the moon landing. you dont even know why they faked it, you just say because CIA/NAZI/ALIENS.. ignorance must be bliss indeed.
every single explaination given to you are completely dismissed/ignored for example the keep out zones.. they are suggestions.. and for apollo 12,14-16 they extend to a distance of 1m-3m.. what kind of conspiracy is that?

perhaps you can enlighten us about the enforced keep out zones they have on the moon and not the suggested ones? nope?? you cant, why not?? because you dont know why they recommend a 1m-3m barrier?

or perhaps you can tell us how vietnam fits into everything?? its not vs communist expansion because that what TV says, not to mention the communist were buddies with the US.. so then what was it??

so what exactly is stopping them from landing on the moon?

reply to post by choos

so what exactly is stopping them from landing on the moon?

I don't know, radiation?

You'd have to agree that it should be trivial to send a man in a capsule around to loop the moon in 2013. It should be truly trivial. Shouldn't it?

You'd have to agree that in the early years of aviation daring pilots were lining up for the suicide run across the Atlantic Ocean yet not a single human or monkey has been outside the Earth Radiation Belts except for those Apollo astronauts during Richard Nixon's presidency.

It's only natural that we should be suspicious about these things. And the more I scratched the surface of Apollo I keep finding so much BS about it. And it all points to a conspiracy to hide the facts about the Apollo moon missions.

The Apollo radiation dosage per astronaut and the Apollo PRD data will be the key to unlocking this NASA trickery.

reply to post by SayonaraJupiter


radiation? so are you also denying these reports?


turbonium was unable to provide the "true" radiation levels.. perhaps you can??

Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by choos

 

so what exactly is stopping them from landing on the moon?

I don't know, radiation?

You'd have to agree that it should be trivial to send a man in a capsule around to loop the moon in 2013. It should be truly trivial. Shouldn't it?

You'd have to agree that in the early years of aviation daring pilots were lining up for the suicide run across the Atlantic Ocean yet not a single human or monkey has been outside the Earth Radiation Belts except for those Apollo astronauts during Richard Nixon's presidency.

It's only natural that we should be suspicious about these things. And the more I scratched the surface of Apollo I keep finding so much BS about it. And it all points to a conspiracy to hide the facts about the Apollo moon missions.

The Apollo radiation dosage per astronaut and the Apollo PRD data will be the key to unlocking this NASA trickery.

You are clueless about the space program arent you im assuming by PRD data your talking about readings? Well it didnt work that way they wore badges and periodic readings had to be called in off a dosimeter. The only one concerned was the flight surgeon monitoring the astronauts health. And even then if its within expected limits he didnt even need to write it down. His job was to look out for the health of the crew and even had the power to abort the mission if he felt there was a problem like oh i dont know more radiation then expected.

Originally posted by choos

Originally posted by turbonium1
The experts I've quoted prove you wrong. They clearly say adequate shielding is needed in the deep space environment.

So, how about you citing these experts who support your claim, that no shielding at all is needed for short-term lunar missions, except in the case of large SPE's?

That should be quite interesting.....

oh no, you caught me out.. i dont actually have any... no wait i do:

refer to 0g/cm2 for aluminium and polyethylene..19 and 20 cGy per YEAR and 120 and 95 cSv per YEAR.. during a solar minimum that equates to about 3.94cSv dose equivalent on the skin for 12 days.

lets see the maximum allowable for 30 days.. hmmm.. on the skin its 1.5Sv.. which means we are about 38 times under the limit.
BFO: 3.12cSv for a 12 day mission the limit for 30 days is 0.25Sv.. which mean we are about 8 times under the limit.

cant believe you brought this back up so quickly hahahaha

I didn't expect you to try the same old nonsense yet again. Apollo data does not mean squat. That is the data being questioned in the first place!

I'm asking you for current experts who support your claim (about no shield being required). So what do you have?