posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 10:49 AM
in the 2004 elections W. got more votes than any winning candidate ever did.
but, as it turns out, the loser, j. kerry, also got more votes than any other winning candidate ever did.
it seems that the proverbial 'ballot box' was being 'stuffed', probably for bush [recall his low popularity #'s] to win, because, agin a
coincidence, his family was the owners of the diebold corporation who made both the voting machines and the software for most of the country!
i have not heard this issue discussed this time around, not sure if diebold is still involved with this?
i would suspect, if that is still the case, that many of the voter fraud issues being 'exposed' are in reality, just a smokescreen for what may be
really be the big issue here ... a 'backdoor' in the computer software allowing more direct control over the numbers.