It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Americanist
Right from the beginning I would have to take on a "general purpose" audience.
I think you are mixing "general purpose" with "those who have forsaken critical thinking and thinking in general". You see,
Spiral arms (the grooves) tend to resemble... You might have guessed it - tentacles.
...what? I've observed octopi and while they curl their tentacles once in a while, they don't wrap them around their bodies in spiral pattern (like what you observe in some galaxies).
Magnetic currents denote movement/ spin.
Movement and spin are different entities, and you didn't even bother to explain what the "magnetic current" is. But thanks for an object lesson on what graphomania may look like.
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Originally posted by Bedlam
reply to post by ImaFungi
Inertia. It was spinning to begin with, and there's no reason for it to slow down - much. Some rotational energy is lost to tidal forces with the Sun and moon.
why was it spinning to begin with?
The short answer: conservation of angular momentum - the original dust/hydrogen cloud was rotating. The spin is conserved.
The long answer: this is a fairly good link
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Good question. I'm not sure we will have a full answer to that until we have a quantum theory of gravity, which we are still working on but don't have yet. It's a theoretical gap.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Good question. I'm not sure we will have a full answer to that until we have a quantum theory of gravity, which we are still working on but don't have yet. It's a theoretical gap.
Perhaps the Keshe Foundation has answers.
I answered that question about the path the Earth takes here:
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Originally posted by Bedlam
The short answer: conservation of angular momentum - the original dust/hydrogen cloud was rotating. The spin is conserved.
The long answer: this is a fairly good link
thanks for that.....
do the planets ( more specifically to think about.,, earth ) revolve horizontally around the sun? as in passing in front of the suns future path and then swinging around? or do they orbit some other directional and angular way? like vertically wobbly around?
The Earth formed as part of the birth of the Solar System: what eventually became the solar system initially existed as a large, rotating cloud of dust, rocks, and gas. It was composed of hydrogen and helium produced in the Big Bang, as well as heavier elements ejected by supernovas. As this interstellar dust is inhomogeneous, any asymmetry during gravitational accretion results in the angular momentum of the eventual planet.[22] The current rotation period of the Earth is the result of this initial rotation and other factors, including tidal friction and the hypothetical impact of Theia.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
These ideas come from the e-book The Quantum Key by Aaron C. Murakami, published in 2009 by White Dragon Press.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Good question. I'm not sure we will have a full answer to that until we have a quantum theory of gravity, which we are still working on but don't have yet. It's a theoretical gap.
Perhaps the Keshe Foundation has answers.
Keshe has ideas that don't square with plethora of experimental observations.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
These ideas come from the e-book The Quantum Key by Aaron C. Murakami, published in 2009 by White Dragon Press.
The Aether is free of mass and is the source of all electrical charge. It is the precursor of any force. Force is an effect of Aether interacting with mass.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
These ideas come from the e-book The Quantum Key by Aaron C. Murakami, published in 2009 by White Dragon Press.
Ponder this: The Aether is a gas made of something smaller than the smallest subatomic particles. It moves and flows like a gas under pressure and is all-pervasive.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by john_bmth
Your reply indicates the weakness of your understanding.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by Mary Rose
These ideas come from the e-book The Quantum Key by Aaron C. Murakami, published in 2009 by White Dragon Press.
A screenshot of page 75 of the e-book, from Chapter 5 "Gravity," illustrating the effect caused when mass displaces the Aether, and the Aether bounces back:
Originally posted by ImaFungi
this is actually similar to what i imagined may be the case... when thinking of what einstein ment by space-time being "something" or a fabric.... and also when he thought it could be distorted.....
if the "vacuum" is a fabric of quantum energy.. then i could imagine that energy reacting to a mass displacing it in the manner suggested...
this vacuum squeezing mass effect may have an effect from the middle of the mass,, to the surface of the mass, and beyond into space such as seen by gravity,,, with a force that wares of the further you are from the mass by the inverse square...
Originally posted by Mary Rose
"Reprint from Ed Leedskalnin Advertisement - The Miami Daily News 1945":
Before my research work I knew nothing about electricity. The only thing I knew was that nobody knows what electricity is. So I thought I am going to find out why they do not know. I thought that if electricity could be made and managed for over a hundred years, then the makers do not know what it is, there is something wrong about it. I found out that the researchers were misled by wrong instruction books, and by one-sided instruments. Voltmeters and ampere meters are one-sided. They only show what is called by instruction books, positive electricity, but never show negative electricity.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by Mary Rose
"Reprint from Ed Leedskalnin Advertisement - The Miami Daily News 1945":
Before my research work I knew nothing about electricity. The only thing I knew was that nobody knows what electricity is. So I thought I am going to find out why they do not know. I thought that if electricity could be made and managed for over a hundred years, then the makers do not know what it is, there is something wrong about it. I found out that the researchers were misled by wrong instruction books, and by one-sided instruments. Voltmeters and ampere meters are one-sided. They only show what is called by instruction books, positive electricity, but never show negative electricity.