Originally posted by Jchristopher5
I saw this post and I was hoping that it was from you. No, you have explained nothing about the Roswell mystery. You have, as usual, provided no
evidence only your tired brand of skepticism.
Let me go through this again.
1. Our government released press that a flying disk had been captured. According to the man in the center of the press release, Lt. Haut, he believed
that it was extraterrestrial. He saw 4' bodies with large heads. He put this in a death bed testimony. Also, the local mortician, Glenn Dennis, said
he was asked for child's caskets, from the base.
All of this proves that something unusual crashed, piloted by small beings.
2. Marcel and others testified that the wreckage was of a material unknown to him. Memory metals and rigid Ibeams with strange hieroglyphics. It was
seen by his son, and by a couple of dozen others. This was clearly NOT a weather balloon or anything of the sort. In your heart, you know marcel would
not have mistaken this material for a balloon. That is silly.
3. The memo held by Ramey is the debris photo is very telling. While it is impossible to make all of it out, phrases like "aviators of the disk" and
"balloon PR" jump off the page.
4. The silly Mogel cover, and the later "case closed" on the alien bodies is over the top silliness by the military and government. These dummies
were dropped in the 1950s, not in 1947, and this explains what people saw? Wow, I have some land for you if you buy that.
I am not buying the silliness that you are posting here "The Shreck". Roswell remains unexplained, but clearly leans to the ET/ED hypothesis.
Well put, any body that changes their story THREE times or gives an explanation THREE times is at it and out to deceive, that is a fact and proven by
the USAF intelligences offering ,eh i mean CHANGING their stories three times.To simply dismiss witnesses , to dismiss the fact that the PAB at the
time of this incident had no real plans on how to deal with UFO sightings never mind one actually crashing, they reported like it was, they acted out
of not knowing better,they had no real contigancy plans in place, there was no briefing or debunking protocols to staff about UFOs at that time,no
blue book debunking personal who could get in there quick to orchestrate an effective cover up, in short the FIRST report given to the press was one
of innocence , truthfulness and one of awe at what had happened or "lets tell the world about this, this needs telling"
.Then of-course the cover began and the USAF intelligence began what was to be the start of a systematic agenda of cover ups and debunking tactics,
this is the reason that their primary cover up balloon nonsense failed and was transparent, the USAF was in its PRIMARY stage of the debunking and
cover up agendas, they got it wrong THREE times are we really being asked to not only accept but believe known and proven LIARS.
It may suit some to go down this rather abstruse and dangerous road of putting your trust in a known liar but not for me, they lied ,they eventually
got better at, lying with various UFO investigatory fronts such as "blue book" and the "Condon" report but not completely or as they thought that is
until the work of the late Dr James E MacDonald proves in his systematic dismantling of the transparent USAF force fit debunking explanations and his
paper named ;"science in default ;30 years of inadequate scientific investigation's in to UFOs";
Why the need for force fit debunking explanations ,why say that UFOs hold no threat to national security when in reality objects were entering and
leaving restricted air space at WILL , is that not a real cause for concern, is that not breaching all protocols of national security and most of all
is that not a contradiction and once again a LIE we have the liars lying again. Why the need to come out in the FIRST place with such a statement of
we have a saucer ,it is not from this world, why attract the mother of all attractions to your self with such a statement if you had NOTHING to hide
in the first place, it just does not add up.
Sceptics are all very well and needed sometimes but when they continually try to force fit their debunking strategies based on speculations based on
information ect not from witnesses directly involved but from the official sources of their versions of events forgive me if i reject it , how
may lies does it take to produce a truth, none in my book,how many changes of events does it take to make one start to perceive that it reeks of
desperation a failed attempt at covering up something so profound ,so earth shattering to all known perceptions of ourselves and our part in it , so
profound that if it was officially admit that this was indeed a ET intelligence then it would be such a game changer that a very nervous and guilt
ridden attempt ,(three times),at a cover up would naturally follow.
The first reported story emanating from Roswell was the truth, that to me after the above deductions is the more believable and i am no liar i may
add, when Roswell is looked at and perceived in a Sherlock Homes perception the Dr Watson in all us can be seen, elementary my dear Watson springs
edit on 15/07/2010 by K-PAX-PROT because: (no reason given)
edit on 15/07/2010 by K-PAX-PROT because: (no reason