Tutankhamun - new evidence shows Carter, stole from tomb

page: 3
9
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 02:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by thePharaoh
 


Pharaoh I think the AE had a good idea who lived to the south of them........lol, Nubians, but then the ancient Egyptians called their land the medjay.....remember we call the AE Egyptians when they themselves called themselves, kemites and later they were called misr.....

firstly, medjay means holy warrior....pharaoh and priests bodyguards

the land was known as al-khem...land of the nile

misr is a jewish word...mizriam..land of two people....


peace




posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 03:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hanslune


Of course its silly to think AE women were asians, they simply used a yellow colour to depict them, just like they used red to depict men........but that red paint ages...and what colour does it turn? You might also want to consider the effect on people who are out in the sun for long periods of time..



Correct....when the AE depict men they use red ocher and when they depict females they use yellow ocher. Not only that but when they mummify males they paint the body with red ocher and when they mummify females they paint the body with yellow ocher.



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 03:02 PM
link   
reply to post by LUXUS
 


you made it intirguing....then whats with the name of the vid

there was hykosis influence in the theban royal line.....in the 18th dynasty...thats where the dodgy dna comes from.

peace

8 years before???....as in...in world war1.....and to think ww2 was fought in egypt.....what did the rich german and british find there???.....

edit on 5-11-2012 by thePharaoh because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 03:18 PM
link   
reply to post by thePharaoh
 



Thats a radio interview so dont have a name for a vid. What did they (the secret society's) find?...well stuff they dont want the general public knowing about, basically ancient technology and forbidden historical info. That gold mask that everyone thinks is king tut is actually his brother (was made for his brother).



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 03:50 PM
link   
reply to post by LUXUS
 

Wrong. The coffins which held his viscera in the canopic jars were made for his brother.
edit on 11/5/2012 by PrplHrt because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 03:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by thePharaoh


firstly, medjay means holy warrior....pharaoh and priests bodyguards


Nope AE name of Nubia and insome cases for the people they hired as mercenaries


misr is a jewish word...mizriam..land of two people....


Nope Arabic name for Egypt, its what Egyptians call themselves to this day



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by LUXUS
Michael Tsarion says that....snip.....



That the problem he's well known for making wild stuff up



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 03:59 PM
link   
How Carter and company multilated the Pharaoh's remains to get his gold jewelry was a disgrace to archeology.After that desecration who's supposed to believe Carter wouldn't have lined his pockets secretly.



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 04:05 PM
link   
brother???...thats going too far and just opening a can of worms

end of 18th dynasty:

Amenhotep 3
Amenhotep 4 (akhenaten)
Nefernefruaten (smenkhkaRE)
Tutankamun
Ay
Horemheb

i know he had females in his life...didnt realise he could of had a brother...who was eligible.
maybe..actually most definatly he would of had a step-brother....



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 04:08 PM
link   
reply to post by AgentX09
 

The remains were mutilated not because Carter & Co. were in pursuit of gold but because the mummy was saturated with resins for preservation.

Does anyone posting in this forum read books, or is everything done by drive-by Wikipedia?



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 04:17 PM
link   
hanslune..."hired mercenaries"....tuttut

they were the worlds first professional soldier...elite guards of the pharaoh and the great house
they shared the same bloodline of the ruling elite....

cmon... because they are now known as "nubians" (which could mean ugandan)...doesnt mean the pharaoh wasnt the same as them...they are known as the A-Group




Originally posted by Hanslune
Nope Arabic name for Egypt, its what Egyptians call themselves to this day



yes i know...but it apperently came from the jewish word mizriam...
edit on 5-11-2012 by thePharaoh because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 04:18 PM
link   
Tut's lineage

AFAIK he had 6 sisters
edit on 5/11/12 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 04:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by thePharaoh

Originally posted by Hanslune
Nope Arabic name for Egypt, its what Egyptians call themselves to this day



yes i know...but it apperently came from the jewish word mizriam...


Feel free to think that.....



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 05:39 PM
link   
Theft is theft , to disturb the final resting place or burial grounds of anyone no matter how long ago the person perished has always seemed sort of disrespectful to me, archeologist or grave robber.

On the ethnicity of the ancient Egyptians, I would say the monuments and art tell the story and without question depict thick lips, dark or brown skin overwhelmingly even the kings and gods go back as far as King Menes or his father Narmer resemble what today would be considered African, no DNA test necessary, even though there are some art and statues that could resemble Arab , aryans and possibly Asian looking ancient Egyptians but not as many.

Look at the Cairo Museum or Luxor but no one really knows who they were but many wished they could trace their lineage to these possibly mathematically genius people if they did indeed create the pyramids and other wonders.



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by phinubian
 


nice to meet you

2007....and only 413 posts....im honoured that you graced this thread lol

peace



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 05:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Viking9019
 


Egyptians today are light skinned as a result of hundreds and hundreds of years of migration from their norther neighbors from the Middle East.

The same way we can explain the existence of all light skinned African Americans in the The united states who don't even have white relatives as far as anyone alive can remember.

The oldest people there the ancient Egyptians were darkskinned that is why many of them were painted that way including rulers who did not work outdoors and got "sunburned" as some ignorant guy mentioned earlier. The Egyptians did not make mistakes when it came to depicting their people on monuments specially not when it came to leaders and that so called "reddish color" can also be found on many depictions of Nefertiti.

It is really that hard to admit that they were possibly black, it was many thousands years ago, come on... Things change, white people rule the world now anyways.

Who the f.... cares, besides racist people.



posted on Nov, 7 2012 @ 07:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Eniii
 


The non-racist people realize that the AE cannot be placed in either catagory, they are neither 'Black' nor 'White', they are ancient Egyptians

Sorry to confuse you but Pharaohs didn't live cloistered lives they were outside a great deal - being as they were the head guy and head priest with many duties to perform

Yes AE men were in the sun alot, which is why they probably used red to denote men vs yellow for women who generally stay indoors more. They used the colour black for Nubians........



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 01:29 AM
link   
Here a question for our AE = Black or White people believers

Lets says we have a person who has incredible pale skin she is called A and is rated 01 out of 100 and is White

We have another woman who has jet black skin and is rated 100 out of 100, she is Black

So they are separated by 98 people of different shades going from pure white to pure black, which person by number switches from White to Black and then which person switches from Black to White.

Good luck



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Hanslune
 



the colour is not an issue....they ranged from 01....to 100

as long as the mother is a theban....than her child can rule...white or black

the job was to stop white foreigners sleeping with a theban woman....which is how we got foreign pharaohs (hykosis)

the fact that the mother was a theban....then the child will be considered black...as you know black is more dominant.


90% of pharoah were 50+.......as in the shade......but 100% theban......ie black


its not about colour...it just so happens the ruling elite were black....and they tried to keep the bloodlone pure...



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 01:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by thePharaoh
reply to post by Hanslune
 



the colour is not an issue....they ranged from 01....to 100


Really, really but you constantly bring it up, can we take that you have now rejected colour as a determinant?



some strange stuff....



90% of pharoah were 50+.......as in the shade......but 100% theban......ie black,


You just stated above that, 'the colour is not an issue' so why are you bring it back? Okay so you said '50+' are black why is 49 not black? Please explain?

At what point if you have a X ancestor do you cease to be the race of that ancestor if your relatives marry only the Y race in the future?



new topics
top topics
 
9
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join