It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by Agarta
If a vampire bit a zombie, would the zombie become a vampire or would the vampire become a zombie?
None of the above. They both dont have a bloodstream.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by FraternitasSaturni
None of the above. They both dont have a bloodstream.
In order for an organism to function, cellular activity must be present. Additionally, zombies would have a STAGNANT blood stream...blood pond, if you will. Congealed. But a vampiric virus could possibly jumpstart the cells.
My answer was a new breed of vampires, considering the zombie virus would most likely just mutate the existing vampire virus so that vampires could no longer control their hunger. Especially since vampires are generally depicted as having regenerative powers, taking the whole degeneration problem out of the equation.
Just a fun question.
Originally posted by Hefficide
Me? I'm on the side of the zombies. You never see them falling prey to shiny things and dogmatic division. So what you refer to as a zombie apocalypse... I see as the beginnings of a perfect world.
~Heff