It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For years, many have searched for the origins of people living on islands throughout Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Their roots can be traced to China, according to some linguists and human biologists (who study both genetics and bones).
Now for the first time, some archaeologists in Hawaii are documenting evidence linking China’s ancient seafaring cultures with the Pacific. This also marks the first time an international team of archaeologists from China, Taiwan and the United States are collaborating in their research about these ancient seafaring civilizations that once flourished in southeast China 3000 to 7000 years ago.
The research is groundbreaking because it establishes how seafaring technology developed in prehistoric China and it's important in understanding the origins of Pacific heritage.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by jude11
I suppose anything is possible. Both cultures loved Jade......
I recall reading an article about giant anchor stones being found up and down the West coast of North and South America that resembled known Chinese stone anchors but on a much grander scale. Of course many also thought they were naturally occurring formed stones that simply resembled them ...
So.
The land bridge connection would have occurred at a much much earlier period than the statues and figurines are believed dated to be.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by jude11
If anyone could have made the trip it would have been Zheng He but that was much more recent than what we are discussing.
If you haven't seen this yet this is a mind blower....
Zheng He's ship compared to Columbus's
but even cutting it in half to perhaps satisfy the Historians leaves a lot to argue with again.
The purported size of the Ming ships is strongly disputed by maritime historians.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by TheSparrowSings
This is a fairly well known Olmec stela from la venta. I've always pondered if it could have been some sort of stylized representation of a Chinese "Dragon boat"
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by SLAYER69
I once watched some history show on the tv box where anchor stones, used by the Chinese, were found all up and down the west coast of America.
Fascinating article.
Stick charts were made and used by the Marshallese to navigate the Pacific Ocean by canoe off the coast of the Marshall Islands. The charts represented major ocean swell patterns and the ways the islands disrupted those patterns, typically determined by sensing disruptions in ocean swells by islands during sea navigation. Stick charts were typically made from the midribs of coconut fronds tied together to form an open framework.
Island locations were represented by shells tied to the framework, or by the lashed junction of two or more sticks. The threads represented prevailing ocean surface wave-crests and directions they took as they approached islands and met other similar wave-crests formed by the ebb and flow of breakers. Individual charts varied so much in form and interpretation that the individual navigator who made the chart was the only person who could fully interpret and use it.
Use of stick charts and navigation by swells apparently ended after World War II, when new electronic technologies made navigation more accessible, and travel between islands by canoe lessened.
The debate over Polynesian migrations is a long running one. Early European voyagers in the Pacific were perplexed by the existence of people who were obviously culturally related but who inhabited the widely dispersed islands of the Pacific.
European navigators were particularly confused as their own technology had only just allowed them to voyage to these islands, and yet on landing they seemed to be inevitably confronted by people using stone-age technology who had reached these small and widely scattered pieces of land well before them.
Once appeals to divine intervention were no longer thought a sufficient explanation for Polynesian dispersal, speculation about their methods of finding and settling islands became widespread, and among the explanations proposed was that of accidental voyaging.