It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You've misunderstood the metaphysical ramifications of making a choice. When you choose someone to run your affairs for you, you are choosing NOT to run them yourself.
Originally posted by Koros
First, I will say that (since I am new here), I have no idea what you are on about when it comes to the Corporation of the United States, and all that jazz. I'll just smile and nod on that one.
But, that said, the "don't vote, you'll only encourage the bastards" mentality is one that is far from new, and far from effective.
That's the beauty of this. Your assertion is not true, because consciousness is the cause of physical events, not the other way around. We're given the illusion of being causal, but we are all effect.
In order for that to even remotely work, you would need 100% buy in from the eligible voters.
But it will only have the consent of the one you mentioned. Consent is required for lawful governance. And all current governance, no matter how criminal it looks, is lawfully doing the will of the people they work for.
Elections aren't determined based on the percentage of votes a candidate received out of the total percentage of eligible voters. They are determined based on how many votes were received out of how many voted. If one person, JUST ONE, votes in an election, a candidate will win and the system you seem to hold so much antipathy for will keep on keeping on.
I've known this is a dream world for a long time, friend. Seems like you think it's "real", as in immutable, "out there", happening when no one's looking. Read up on some quantum physics and metaphysics...
And, if you think that you deciding to revoke your consent to be governed means squat, you are living in a dream world.
I comport myself lawfully. Why shouldn't I? I don't "obey" the precepts of man, but my proper comportment miraculously has the effect of keeping me from going afoul of the (so far) lawfully-dispensed corporate agents.
The government (no matter how you define that term) are the ones with the guns, the army, the police, the courts, and the jails. Go ahead, revoke your consent to be governed, then see how well that goes for you if you decide to violate a law because you don't think it applies to you.
You don't even know what a trust is, or that the US gov't is a corporation, and you come to me with this? Meh. I'm not going to waste the calories to type a well thought-out answer to that knee-jerk.
Your plan may sound good in theory, but it is an impossible goal. Any plan that requires 100% participation to succeed will fail. Period.
Actually, the revocation of consent comes before the decision not to vote, but the two come together as a unit.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I've really got to ask this because I work my butt off daily pushing the 100% opposite message. I'm in the middle of a major ongoing project for an original short animated movie on the topic, in fact. A lot of effort for something I deeply believe in with all I have.
So..knowing where I'm coming from to ask, if that helps any, what does anyone figure is gained by not voting? The OP says it withdraws consent, and in a way...that's true.
It doesn't matter. There is an Entity in charge that does care, and the "leaders" can only do as they are empowered to do by that Entity. I believe the relevant quote is "You would have no power over me at all if it were not given to you by God" (John 19:11) Get it straight, I am not a Christian, nor am I a Bible Thumper, but I recognize truth when I read it, and the Bible has a LOT of truth in it. Enough, in fact, that through careful study, you can actually reach the Truth. Of course, you have to develop a good B.S. meter, because there's a bit of that in there, too.
However, that would be assuming we have leaders that would even care either way?
I don't dispute that, but what I'm getting at is a metaphysical issue and not a physically-based one.
The party Faithful will vote blindly, every time regardless of who it is, and so numbers will never be totally unacceptable. Even the most boring OFF years pull 30-35% voting ratios to the general registered public. National Election years are 40-50% usually.
You can't get there by being mad. You have to accept responsibility for all the crimes that THEY have committed in YOUR name. Because, they are your responsibility. It is your support that continues the charade. You will only "cede everything we have left" of THEIR SYSTEM that THEY CONTROL. There's a whole real world governed by real law that they do not control. They can only take from you what they have given you. I really encourage you to watch "Spot Ø" in the videos above. Roger goes through a very thorough explanation of why it is that you won't lose "everything we have left".
I can see where not being involved quite literally cedes everything we have left to those who will happily take it as opposed to feeling put out by the fact we're mad......but I can't see where the lack of action does more?
Ron Paul was controlled opposition. You can't turn the fiction against itself. Those who make the rules will not allow it. Your leaders, if you want to participate in that system, are SELECTED, not ELECTED.
I can say this and say it with the 100% confidence of absolute fact. Ron Paul lost Missouri. He shouldn't have. He didn't lose by being cheated (outside of a couple WELL publicized cases that got criminal by how far the GOP went against him) He lost because NO ONE BOTHERED TO VOTE.
Apathy is another form of consent.
We have the Caucus system here. PURE numbers CARRY that system 100% and totally. Period. We didn't have them. 1,500 were estimated to have attended the rally I was at for Dr. Paul a few days before the caucus. I'd guess 150 were in the training session I also attended on how the Caucus worked and how to conduct ourselves. A FRACTION of that attended the real caucus and the ONLY place that showing up made ANY difference at all. He lost by apathy of the very people who claimed to care the most.
I respectfully suggest that my way is not apathy, but 100% self-responsibility. I have waived ALL benefits. I don't even expect a fire truck to come to my burning house unless I pay them. (not that one can really pay with fiat currency, but that's outside the scope of this discussion) The only thing I expect of the system is to keep its chattel in check. That is, if someone comes to my house hassling me, I'm calling the Sheriff (farmer) to come and remove his yahoo (cow) from my yard.
Apathy for decades and a disregard for who got elected in the bigger picture is what GOT us here. More apathy in the name of protest won't reverse it, but solidify our futures to what it's been.
You really, really need to see "Spot Ø" Trust me, you'll laugh all the way through. That is, when you're not crying.
THIS isn't even political. Not one bit. I don't care WHO someone votes for...just be active. It's the only thing we have left as Americans that IS 100% and totally our own choice to make and act upon. Don't give up the very last thing we've all got....by choice? (Hops off Soapbox)
Originally posted by Koros
Seamus,
Don't worry about "wasting the calories to type out a response" to me. Honestly, nothing you've said even resembles rational thought anyway, so I don't feel I'm missing out on much. If you want to rant and rail against the "trust" and the "corporation of the United States," all the while insinuating I'm ignorant and need to read books on quantum physics (as if the two topics are even remotely connected), feel free.
I'm just going to file this thread under tin foil hat territory and move on to rational topics.
Violence is not even necessary as a last resort. What, you want to stay on a planet that doesn't allow peaceful, responsible co-existence? I sure don't, and I am (and have been) calling their bluff. So far, four summonses rebuffed (almost a year ago now) with no fallout. They can't force me into their venue without my consent. Consent is the key. Consent is what "God" sees.
Originally posted by chiroy
OP, great post. I enjoyed the read.
I wouldn't say I'm all in favour of self-govermence, but it definately beat the hell out of our current system.
I've given it some thought and I'm still not sure whether or not 'not voting' is the way to go. Voting in itself is utterly ludicrous and futile (as there is no difference between the people who you are voting for), but not voting - what does that change? Not much.
No, I do not believe the system can be changed from inside with tools the system provides - too late!!
Only through active non-cooperation (or through lots of violence) can things change, but unfortunately for that to happen a whole lot of people are going to have to wake up from their zombie state. I don't see that happening very soon either. Maybe we are just screwed!
I'd like to know why you think that I'm under the impression that my avatar would protect me from anything (except, maybe, NOT having an avatar...it protects me from that).
Originally posted by seamus
Originally posted by Koros
Seamus,
Don't worry about "wasting the calories to type out a response" to me. Honestly, nothing you've said even resembles rational thought anyway, so I don't feel I'm missing out on much. If you want to rant and rail against the "trust" and the "corporation of the United States," all the while insinuating I'm ignorant and need to read books on quantum physics (as if the two topics are even remotely connected), feel free.
I'm just going to file this thread under tin foil hat territory and move on to rational topics.
I really, REALLY like the symbology in your avatar. However, I advise against allowing yourself to think it protects you from the truth that is coming home to roost.
Originally posted by Koros
I'd like to know why you think that I'm under the impression that my avatar would protect me from anything (except, maybe, NOT having an avatar...it protects me from that).
Enlighten me. I know exactly why I picked what I did as my avatar. I'm curious to know what you think it signifies.
Originally posted by seamus
Originally posted by Koros
I'd like to know why you think that I'm under the impression that my avatar would protect me from anything (except, maybe, NOT having an avatar...it protects me from that).
I know what it signifies. I suspect you do, too. Unless, perhaps, you picked it out at random? Or thought it "looked cool"? I worked a long time to come up with a good avatar. I think most people who care enough to post what you have, would put the same work into it, or even more.
4444
5
I don't think so. What it signifies to me is probably different from what it signifies to you, but that's to be expected. I know what it signifies to me, and that is the message FOR me. From your point of view it probably looks more like how I see mine. I expect those with your mindset to add their service to my ideas. It happens like clockwork. I appreciate the help, though I know it's taboo for you to acknowledge it.
Originally posted by Koros
Enlighten me. I know exactly why I picked what I did as my avatar. I'm curious to know what you think it signifies.
Originally posted by seamus
Originally posted by Koros
I'd like to know why you think that I'm under the impression that my avatar would protect me from anything (except, maybe, NOT having an avatar...it protects me from that).
I know what it signifies. I suspect you do, too. Unless, perhaps, you picked it out at random? Or thought it "looked cool"? I worked a long time to come up with a good avatar. I think most people who care enough to post what you have, would put the same work into it, or even more.
4444
5
Originally posted by seamus
I don't think so.
Originally posted by seamus
What it signifies to me is probably different from what it signifies to you, but that's to be expected. I know what it signifies to me, and that is the message FOR me. From your point of view it probably looks more like how I see mine.
Originally posted by seamusI expect those with your mindset to add their service to my ideas.
Glad I could help? Whatever it is you are doing that I apparently helped with, I hope it works out for ya. Best of luck there, dude!
Originally posted by seamusIt happens like clockwork. I appreciate the help, though I know it's taboo for you to acknowledge it.
Just as you should. I'm not interested in entering into contract with you in any way. I don't like getting jelly on my shirt. I thought that was obvious from my tone.
Originally posted by Koros
Originally posted by seamus
I don't think so.
Just as I expected.
Promise? Thanks!
Originally posted by seamus
What it signifies to me is probably different from what it signifies to you, but that's to be expected. I know what it signifies to me, and that is the message FOR me. From your point of view it probably looks more like how I see mine.
Yes, most likely. I know what your avatar signifies to me, though it is probably different than what it signifies to you. That is the nature of symbolism. It is culture-bound, context-driven, and highly subjective.
Originally posted by seamusI expect those with your mindset to add their service to my ideas.
Uh huh. Well, if you think you know my mindset from a few brief posts on here, then I'll leave you to it. Good luck there.
I don't believe in luck.
Glad I could help? Whatever it is you are doing that I apparently helped with, I hope it works out for ya. Best of luck there, dude!
Originally posted by seamusIt happens like clockwork. I appreciate the help, though I know it's taboo for you to acknowledge it.edit on 10/18/2012 by Koros because: Typo