It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by Itisnowagain
In relation to the topic, the 'now' gives us the basic details with which to flesh out the very bones connecting everything. The past gives us the leisure to sit back and flesh it out, like an artist filling in a sketching that was drawn on the fly. The future is the image that we hold in our minds as we flesh it out, what we plan for it to look like. At any time, the image may change as we realize that certain adjustments bear more merit than what we had originally intended, but the core idea remains - unless, again, certain adjustments bear crucial merit.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by Itisnowagain
I see where your muddle understanding of time and its effect stems from. You have a brutally desolate view of time that has yet to be, and time that has been.
You have a lot of baggage, in other words. Therefore, you THINK your 'present' is free, but it is never free because if your past holds guilt and your future holds dread, then you are forever holding yourself back. What from, I don't know, but that is the only logical conclusion.
Otherwise, your past would hold joy, and your future would hold hope...and your present would hold opportunity.
This image that is appearing presently is real. It can be seen and heard, tasted and touched - there is direct conscious contact with this. This is where life actually is.
Humans don't live in this rich sensational world.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
Right now, I can feel the resistance of the keys beneath my fingers, hear the conversations behind me, hear the clicking of the keys, I can see the monitor and my fingers on the keys, and I can smell the moist cloth of my jacket (it's been raining horribly for the past few days).
And you say I'm just living in my mind? Seems like it's awfully real to me. And I don't think it's my mind.
Originally posted by Darkblade71
reply to post by obnoxiouschick
More fear of a possibility.
Which is why I stay as close to now as I can.
Originally posted by Darkblade71
reply to post by obnoxiouschick
lol I know.
I want to, but am still bouncing around between apartments.
On lunch break now.
Seriously though in regards to the topic of oneness, it happens...
I don't know how that got onto the topic of living in the now....which is just a find place for me to be, even if some people don't get it, I get it.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by obnoxiouschick
Hmm...so there are certain concepts that you can't define using any human language, is that right? You either know it or you don't.
Couldn't this be applied to religious concepts as well? The fallibility of spoken or communicated language results in the fallibility of a communicated concept results in the fallibility of any organized philosophy that centers around said fallible concept because of the fallibility of the language used to communicate it.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by obnoxiouschick
Hmm...so there are certain concepts that you can't define using any human language, is that right? You either know it or you don't.
We are word and idea junkies; we are addicted to semantic systems.
This means that we use words/ideas with an unchallenged confidence that they bear a somewhat accurate correspondence to the actual state of things, Reality.
Within a limited context this may be somewhat true. We can record information, instructions, recipes, etc. in words, and another human will be able to use those words to approximate the "real-world" conditions we intended to refer to. This semantic functionality has apparently given our species a large evolutionary advantage.
BUT... for "spirituality", inquiry into Reality, into our true condition, words/ideas are worse than useless. They are potentially our biggest impediment.
This is because we may tend to assume that the objects/actions which words refer to, ACTUALLY EXIST IN THE WAY THE WORDS THAT REFER TO THEM SEEM TO DEFINE THEM. That is, we may tend to view our experience as being actually made up of the objects and actions that the words we are using to describe it imply.
This is a fundamental mistake, due to the fact that ALL experience is in actuality an infinite, constantly changing, non-repeating, indefinable (in any final way), unpatterned field of miraculously appearing Radiantly Present "energies" existing nowhere else than IN experience, perceived by unknowable, miraculously appearing "consciousness". But our use of words implies that objects and actions may actually exist in the way we refer to them, as knowable, definable objectively existing "beings", "things" and "situations".
This is actually NOT the case.