Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Evolution and Creationism is easy as math.

page: 10
5
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 03:19 PM
link   
This pretty much sums it up






posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 03:33 PM
link   
Evolution is at least falsifiable, which means it can be proven wrong with experiment and observation. Any theory regarding omnipotent beings isn't, and thus isn't a valid scientific theory.

If something arising from nothing is absurd, then I must ask what did God arise from?

edit on 5-11-2012 by TheSubversiveOne because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 03:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheSubversiveOne
Evolution is at least falsifiable, which means it can be proven wrong with experiment and observation. Any theory regarding omnipotent beings isn't, and thus isn't a valid scientific theory.

If something arising from nothing is absurd, then I must ask what did God arise from?

edit on 5-11-2012 by TheSubversiveOne because: (no reason given)


Stephen Colbert asked himself the same question...almost killed him





posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 08:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheSubversiveOne
Evolution is at least falsifiable, which means it can be proven wrong with experiment and observation. Any theory regarding omnipotent beings isn't, and thus isn't a valid scientific theory.

If something arising from nothing is absurd, then I must ask what did God arise from?

edit on 5-11-2012 by TheSubversiveOne because: (no reason given)



Read my posts and show me where I have suggested creation is anything more than a faith.
Your argument is mute, I dont deny what I believe is faith

I am asking for the evidence, If evolution is as easy as maths then explain it



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 08:17 PM
link   
Google mutations

I did and here is what I got, The argument is repeatable observable and testable.
Now come back with the evidence you state you have



posted on Nov, 5 2012 @ 09:08 PM
link   

ATTENTION~~~~~~~~~



Evolution and Creationism is easy as math.

That is the topic.
Please stick to it...WITHOUT bickering and snide remarks.

You are responsible for your own posts.

We expect civility and decorum within all topics - Please Review This Link.

There will be consequences for those who continue to post in a respectful manner!!!!!!



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 02:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ

Originally posted by borntowatch
Lets not pretend it was JUST ONE question, it was a series and they all need to be answered to prove evolution as a science

Now back to the questions, remember they are as easy as math.
Can this bonehead creatard have an answer or are you now changing tac and running from your fundamentalist evo position of demanding I submit to your faith.

Do I need to refresh you with the questions, elaborate some more.
Let me know your reason for sidestepping the issue

Answer the question PLEASE, release me from my ignorance, prove you are not.

Answer the question PLEASE


Just another hot air spouter is all I see.
edit on 5-11-2012 by borntowatch because: (no reason given)


I answered all your questions and mentioned which ones can't be answered because we don't have objective evidence. Not all your questions even concern evolution, a FACT you keep on ignoring...just like you keep on pretending that your GOD OF THE GAPS argument is somehow valid


It's hilarious how you delude yourself by pretending your questions haven't been answered...kinda like these guys:



Go to Wikipedia, do a search for "evolution" and read the 2 basic articles...you obviously don't have a clue, so if you want to be taken seriously, at least bother learning about the theory


Isnt it funny how you compare me to a monkey yet complain about a term I use

You are the master of hypocrisy.

Amazing the double standard



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 02:58 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 07:59 AM
link   
reply to post by borntowatch
 


No the photo is not comparing you to a monkey, it is an old japanese thing called the wise monkeys here..
en.wikipedia.org...

In the west we use the image to mean turning a blind eye...which you are a master at, seeing people have given you enough proof to many of your questions.
Let me ask you are you still at school?

Oh and let me teach you something else...they are Apes our evolutionary cousins..not monkeys..
edit on 6-11-2012 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 09:10 AM
link   
We're all apes.......




posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 09:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by borntowatch
 


No the photo is not comparing you to a monkey, it is an old japanese thing called the wise monkeys here..
en.wikipedia.org...

In the west we use the image to mean turning a blind eye...which you are a master at, seeing people have given you enough proof to many of your questions.
Let me ask you are you still at school?

Oh and let me teach you something else...they are Apes our evolutionary cousins..not monkeys..
edit on 6-11-2012 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)


The photo in question is a chimpanzee, which is our closest relative. Chimps are apes, not monkeys.

It looks like you're wrong again.



posted on Nov, 6 2012 @ 11:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by borntowatch

Originally posted by TheSubversiveOne
Evolution is at least falsifiable, which means it can be proven wrong with experiment and observation. Any theory regarding omnipotent beings isn't, and thus isn't a valid scientific theory.

If something arising from nothing is absurd, then I must ask what did God arise from?

edit on 5-11-2012 by TheSubversiveOne because: (no reason given)



Read my posts and show me where I have suggested creation is anything more than a faith.
Your argument is mute, I dont deny what I believe is faith

I am asking for the evidence, If evolution is as easy as maths then explain it


My comment wasn't directed at you. Your rebuttal is mute.

Maybe read 'On the Origin of Species'—at least to properly understand what you are arguing against. If you already have, then you are in possession of plenty of evidence.



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 02:01 PM
link   
I didn't call you a monkey, I posted the picture because it shows your reaction to facts that disagree with your irrational unproven belief


In short, I wasn't attacking you, I was making fun of the content of your post
edit on 15/11/12 by masqua because: Quote removed



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 12:24 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 12:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 05:08 PM
link   
So one word makes you burst out into a hissy fit
One word challenges your fragile faith and belief

One word, almost mathematical isnt it

I like to use that word, almost an iconoclast of a word
It challenges the perception of your religion.
Isnt it funny you suggest man came from dirt and water and then monkeys and you use the very things you claim to be descended from as an offence

I propose the three wise monkeys are in effect the foundation of evolution
Believe what you cant see
Hear only what cant challenge
Speak out of ignorance



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 05:14 PM
link   
reply to post by borntowatch
 


And you believe this because you disagree with evolution how? What part of evolution do you disagree with?






top topics



 
5
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join