It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Carr continued. “Perhaps—this sounds brutal and callous—perhaps an assassination, combined with a major defection taking a large part of its military, is what is required to get, one, a ceasefire, and, two, political negotiations.”
Originally posted by michael1983l
If the assasination will stop civilians from being attacked by heavy artillery and fast jet bombers then why the hell not. Is an assasination any different to the death penalty?
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Carr continued. “Perhaps—this sounds brutal and callous—perhaps an assassination, combined with a major defection taking a large part of its military, is what is required to get, one, a ceasefire, and, two, political negotiations.”
www.wsws.org...
Just shut-up you stupid fool.. seriously, we are not in the game of calling for countries leaders to be assassinated. There's a reason Americans and British aren't liked, if we start paving the road to allow assassinations and declaring they should be knocked off AKA Julian Assange... we're no better than those doing the killing.
He's advocating assassinating a foreign leader to force that nation into political negotiations. This is a very slippery slope!
Bob, shut the hell up!edit on 11-10-2012 by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by michael1983l
If the assasination will stop civilians from being attacked by heavy artillery and fast jet bombers then why the hell not. Is an assasination any different to the death penalty?