It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On the separation of church and state
"We have this idea in our minds that there's this separation of church and state in America, which I think is a good thing. And we extend that to our politics — not just church and state, but it's also there's a separation of religion and politics. But of course there isn't. Every president says, 'God bless America' at the end of the State of Union address. And everybody, every candidate is quoting some form of the Old and the New Testament in speeches to try and make their own moral points.
"But we don't think of ... a preacher or priest or rabbi or imam, for that matter, endorsing from the pulpit. And I was fascinated by the idea that these guys were going to force the issue, because they've done this for five years — this isn't the first year they've done it. Now they're videotaping it and sending it to the IRS, to just try to poke the hornet's nest of the IRS and say, 'Please take us to court.' Because they're trying to get this forced into a court case, because they think they can win.
"And I, after some thought and talking about it with my writers, I think they're right. ... I think they should be able to endorse from the pulpit. Now whether or not they should get tax-exempt status is another thing, because that is the rest of us subsidizing their political speech. ...
"I think they should be able to do it, but I also think that it's a very dangerous thing to do — not just for our politics, but it's also dangerous for the faith of people who are exercising that right. Because they seem to think that it's a one-way membrane — that they'll get religion into our politics. But they're ignoring the fact that politics will come right back through that gate onto our religion.
"And if you actually have a political party that is this religion, or a political party that is that religion, I think that's a short road to the kind of religious civil war — whether or not it's actually an armed war — but religious civil war that we fled in Europe. America has avoided that. And I think our politics are so horrible these days. ... Why anyone would want that horrible tar on something as fragile as faith is beyond me."
This perked my ears up. If someone believes their religion is THE ONLY RIGHT ONE, and they are therefore "Republican", but the GOP Candidate is Mormon and therefore doesn't agree that their religion is the right one, how does one then vote?
People don't always base all their actions on their religious beliefs.
it's a very dangerous thing to do — not just for our politics, but it's also dangerous for the faith of people who are exercising that right.
Because they seem to think that it's a one-way membrane — that they'll get religion into our politics.
But they're ignoring the fact that politics will come right back through that gate onto our religion.
"And if you actually have a political party that is this religion, or a political party that is that religion, I think that's a short road to the kind of religious civil war — whether or not it's actually an armed war — but religious civil war that we fled in Europe. America has avoided that.
And I think our politics are so horrible these days. ...
Why anyone would want that horrible tar on something as fragile as faith is beyond me."
Well, personally I am not voting on him to be a pastor or minister, but voting on who the best leader IMHO. I'm voting for President, not anything to do with church leadership.
These people, who criticize Obama for "mocking" the Bible, are the same people who want the 10 Commandments posted in court houses, creationism taught in school and abortion and birth control to be criminalized.
They want to bomb Iran back to the stone age and lift Israel to holy status, while praying for Armageddon and the end of civilization as we know it. Now they want to preach politics from the pulpit too!
If they push that envelope, they should loose their tax exempt status, period!
Barack Obama attended a Christian church of Baptist persuasion, under the ministry of Jeremiah Wright. But the right doesn't believe him to be a "Christian." Mitt Romney, a Mormon, who's doctrine dictates that God used to be an Earthy Human, who ascended, and now lives on another planet, is accepted as "Christian enough." They believe in a kind of reincarnation, where a husband and his wives will rule a planet in the afterlife, populated by flora and fauna inhabited by the souls of earthly sinners. They have added to the Holy Bible their own story of Jesus after the resurrection.
But when is comes to the "lesser of two evils" they'll pick Romney's kind of heresy, claiming Obama to be fraud, a pretend Christian! They claim Obama to be a socialist! Awck! Well, what was Jesus, if not a socialist?
Broun is a high-ranking member of the House Science Committee, of which Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.) is also a member.
It wouldn't be anything noteworthy, just another religious nutter, if it wasn't being preached by a Congressman promising to vote by religious guidelines.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Well, personally I am not voting on him to be a pastor or minister, but voting on who the best leader IMHO. I'm voting for President, not anything to do with church leadership.
Good!! So, what is your definition of "the best leader"? One who knows how to destroy other businesses so he and his investors can hide inordinate amounts of wealth off-shore at the expense of people's livelihoods right here? Or, one who knows how it is to live with little to no hope of even finding a job, let alone becoming as rich as he is?
If it's about leadership, which man would you follow?
As I recall, Christ was not a hoarder of wealth, nor did he hide assets from "Caesar". Instead, he expended his own efforts and time with no expectations of becoming a wealthy man. You are avoiding the issue, my friend.
I chose this forum so we could discuss politics from the position of religious affiliation; it is established that there is to be a separation of church and state.
Would you have a problem telling politicians that they can not participate in any religion while holding office? Nor preach from the podium?
Do you think that priests and preachers should discuss political endorsements or condemnations from the pulpit?