These are posts from a free energy thread which were not answered to my satisfaction. I am asking if the system I propose could work......
magnetized liquid metal to produce electricity by its centrifugal motion within a containment unit that manipulates opposing magnetic polarities to
create perpetual flow within the liquid metal. The liquid metal would spin fast enough to create an electric charge which would be used by the
containment vessel to create flow.
why not magnetize mercury and use a system that by its flow within a vacuum environment creates electricity itself.
Can't you heat metal and spin it fast enough to create energy. Look at the earth with its supposed metal core. Can't you mimic that on a smaller scale
and use the magnetism it naturally creates to move liquid metal fast enough to create an electric charge?
liquid so less actual friction and air resistance. I am not a master of fluid dynamics but if you have a constant flow being generated by the fluid
itself, and by its composition an electric charge you could harvest....would that not be eternal free energy...
Can mercury give off an electric charge?....can it be magnetized......?
If so then design a system of tubes in a coned spiral wide to short where on either end you place conductors that lead directly to the liquid metal,
which can harvest the electric charge it would create after spinning by it being magnetized and housed in a casing with an opposite polarity......No?
I have no technical skill, mechanical training, or even a knowledge of basic chemistry. I dreamt this once.
Is it possible?
what about my idea? liquid metal to make electricity....magnetized to provide flow within a containment vessel that manipulates opposing polarities to
create said flow within the liquid metal and so electricity by centrifugal force being applied to it....?
Is that possible? I have zero technical training and ask in earnest....would that work with mercury or molten metal? Magnetized metal being spun at
high velocities to produce electric charge...?
edit on 28-9-2012 by BIHOTZ because: (no reason given)