Forgive me, I am perplexed at what appears to be a contradiction.
I read every word, had I not known the author I would feel inspired. Maybe I am anyway, regardless.
I have read ATS since about 2008, defended it to my friends and family for years.
Being most impressed by the urging of believing in nothing, until it's researched and seen by your own eyes.
These words just read, are a compiled example of what is introduced often an argued on this very site. Like our governments actions, intent of wars,
oppression of people, and the list goes on and on.
It appears it is the messenger that people are rejecting. Or is it the message as well?
How many leaders have we seen stand up and proclaim the very things that we have been criticized as conspirators for believing?
And for all the world to see. Remind me please, when that has happened.
Its not difficult to see why so many find the author to be lacking in authenticity. I understand. However, do not we all say the same about our own
leaders? It is admirable that we defend freedom and the oppressed, and side with those we feel have no platform or voice. And we call out those who
lead them in such a manner.
Things are not forgotten, it is clear. Can't we see that it is the same for our leaders actions?
Remember, they have angered us plenty, as well.
Why are we picking sides? Why not hear the message? Why not see how our reactions fall into their perfect plan to rally the people up for war?
edit on 28-9-2012 by synnergy because: (no reason given)