It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by loam
It drives me nuts that people find this offensive. Success has become so villified, I'm convinced we have become a nation of lazy-ass, envious, whiners.
'Harvest' means they bought companies, made them more valuable through investment, and later sold them for a profit.
The fact that people are offended by the term is simply stupid.
What should they have done? Bought businesses....invested heavily in them...and then lost money????
edit on 28-9-2012 by loam because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by loam
It drives me nuts that people find this offensive. Success has become so villified, I'm convinced we have become a nation of lazy-ass, envious, whiners.
'Harvest' means they bought companies, made them more valuable through investment, and later sold them for a profit.
The fact that people are offended by the term is simply stupid.
What should they have done? Bought businesses....invested heavily in them...and then lost money????
edit on 28-9-2012 by loam because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by loam
It drives me nuts that people find this offensive. Success has become so villified, I'm convinced we have become a nation of lazy-ass, envious, whiners.
'Harvest' means they bought companies, made them more valuable through investment, and later sold them for a profit.
The fact that people are offended by the term is simply stupid.
What should they have done? Bought businesses....invested heavily in them...and then lost money????
edit on 28-9-2012 by loam because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by loam
reply to post by RealSpoke
I haven't said anything about Romney.
I'm addressing all of the business success haters in this thread.edit on 28-9-2012 by loam because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by axslinger
Who cares. When Obama bailed out GM, he dumped Buick, Pontiac, Saturn and Hummer. Tens of thousands lost their jobs to make GM "profitable" AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE and he's a hero but if Romney trims the fat off a company to make it profitable, and utilizes PRIVATE FUNDS, he's somehow evil. Save it. Take your envy and stick it up your ballot box.
Like it or not, big business provides millions of jobs in the US and the government does nothing but cost US WORKING FOLKS our hard earned cash. I worked for a company that dumped 300 employees after they were acquired by a private equity firm and I was one of them. I am now making $15k more per year than I was at that job. It was an opportunity for them as well as for me.
If Romney provides one job from the private sector, FOR the private sector, that is more of a success than Obama spending a trillion dollars of taxpayer money to "create" a thousand jobs. Obama's job history basically works out to costing ME about $200,000 for every $30,000 job he "created". That's liberal math for ya. They see that as a success.
Originally posted by jhn7537
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
Who cares??? He's a business man, this is what companies do... It's a dog eat dog world out there, and being a proponent of capitalism it's his job to turn a profit, not to look out for every company out there...
Originally posted by jhn7537
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
Who cares??? He's a business man, this is what companies do... It's a dog eat dog world out there, and being a proponent of capitalism it's his job to turn a profit, not to look out for every company out there...
Originally posted by DrNotforhire
and obama said in 2008
he wanted to redistribute the wealth I have more of a problem with that then capitalism
I found it extremely informative and balanced. Give it a try, then you can get back to your screaming.
The Wall Street Journal, aiming for a comprehensive assessment, examined 77 businesses Bain invested in while Mr. Romney led the firm from its 1984 start until early 1999, to see how they fared during Bain's involvement and shortly afterward.
The Journal's findings could provide fodder for both critics and supporters of Mr. Romney's presidential ambitions and of his role at Bain.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
1999? He was in charge there until 2002, at least according to Bain SEC filings. Mitt Romney can't even be honest about that.