It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
Originally posted by Tykonos
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine
Stop with the once again thing and show me actual footage of the peaceful protesters, acting peacefully and being attacked by the Police.
So there was a line that they crossed and the Police were there to prevent people crossing it. It sounds like common sense to me.
edit on 26-9-2012 by Tykonos because: (no reason given)
riight.... keep the sheeple in line...
Originally posted by Tykonos
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
Originally posted by Tykonos
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine
Stop with the once again thing and show me actual footage of the peaceful protesters, acting peacefully and being attacked by the Police.
So there was a line that they crossed and the Police were there to prevent people crossing it. It sounds like common sense to me.
edit on 26-9-2012 by Tykonos because: (no reason given)
riight.... keep the sheeple in line...
That's too simplistic. Every society needs a Police force to maintain order or you'll have gangs of thieves and violent people harming the rest of society.
Eyewitness accounts
Two men who were present related what they saw.
Unidentified speaker 1: "Suddenly, they turned around, got on their knees, as if they were ordered to, they did it all together, aimed. And personally, I was standing there saying, they're not going to shoot, they can't do that. If they are going to shoot, it's going to be blank."
Unidentified speaker 2: "The shots were definitely coming my way, because when a bullet passes your head, it makes a crack. I hit the ground behind the curve, looking over. I saw a student hit. He stumbled and fell, to where he was running towards the car. Another student tried to pull him behind the car, bullets were coming through the windows of the car."
As this student fell behind the car, I saw another student go down, next to the curb, on the far side of the automobile, maybe 25 or 30 yards from where I was lying. It was maybe 25, 30, 35 seconds of sporadic firing.
"The firing stopped. I lay there maybe 10 or 15 seconds. I got up, I saw four or five students lying around the lot. By this time, it was like mass hysteria. Students were crying, they were screaming for ambulances. I heard some girl screaming, 'They didn't have blank, they didn't have blank,' no, they didn't."
Killed (and approximate distance from the National Guard):
*Jeffrey Glenn Miller; age 20; 265 ft (81 m) shot through the mouth; killed instantly
*Allison B. Krause; age 19; 343 ft (105 m) fatal left chest wound; died later that day
*William Knox Schroeder; age 19; 382 ft (116 m) fatal chest wound; died almost an hour later in a hospital while undergoing surgery
*Sandra Lee Scheuer; age 20; 390 ft (120 m) fatal neck wound; died a few minutes later from loss of blood
Wounded (and approximate distance from the National Guard):
*Joseph Lewis Jr.; 71 ft (22 m); hit twice in the right abdomen and left lower leg
*John R. Cleary; 110 ft (34 m); upper left chest wound
*Thomas Mark Grace; 225 ft (69 m); struck in left ankle
*Alan Michael Canfora; 225 ft (69 m); hit in his right wrist
*Dean R. Kahler; 300 ft (91 m); back wound fracturing the vertebrae, permanently paralyzed from the chest down
*Douglas Alan Wrentmore; 329 ft (100 m); hit in his right knee
*James Dennis Russell; 375 ft (114 m); hit in his right thigh from a bullet and in the right forehead by birdshot, both wounds minor
*Robert Follis Stamps; 495 ft (151 m); hit in his right buttock
*Donald Scott MacKenzie; 750 ft (230 m); neck wound
Legal action against the guardsmen and others
Eight of the guardsmen were indicted by a grand jury. The guardsmen claimed to have fired in self-defense, a claim that was generally accepted by the criminal justice system. In 1974 U.S. District Judge Frank Battisti dismissed charges against all eight on the basis that the prosecution's case was too weak to warrant a trial.
Originally posted by Panic2k11
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine
A charge is a violent action, there is no possibility of controlling or predicting how it will end for the attacker or the defender. This is why when the police is really intending a charge they use cavalry...
If you see someone confronting you and charging you, do you really turn your back on him. The police is trained (or should be, that video is very strange as they were not even well equipped) to act like a roman flange, forming a shield wall and retreating slowly, even going full testudo formation if under missile attacks, normally the last line will cover with rubber bullets or in case of an overwhelming aggressive change, live rounds.
One should keep in mind the Monday, May 4, 1970 Kent State shootings also known as the May 4 massacre or the Kent State massacre (Kent State University is in the U.S. city of Kent, Ohio). I understand that the weapons mentality is different in Europe but it still is a possibility even if the police has a greater level of certainty that the crowd is not armed...
Eyewitness accounts
Two men who were present related what they saw.
Unidentified speaker 1: "Suddenly, they turned around, got on their knees, as if they were ordered to, they did it all together, aimed. And personally, I was standing there saying, they're not going to shoot, they can't do that. If they are going to shoot, it's going to be blank."
Unidentified speaker 2: "The shots were definitely coming my way, because when a bullet passes your head, it makes a crack. I hit the ground behind the curve, looking over. I saw a student hit. He stumbled and fell, to where he was running towards the car. Another student tried to pull him behind the car, bullets were coming through the windows of the car."
As this student fell behind the car, I saw another student go down, next to the curb, on the far side of the automobile, maybe 25 or 30 yards from where I was lying. It was maybe 25, 30, 35 seconds of sporadic firing.
"The firing stopped. I lay there maybe 10 or 15 seconds. I got up, I saw four or five students lying around the lot. By this time, it was like mass hysteria. Students were crying, they were screaming for ambulances. I heard some girl screaming, 'They didn't have blank, they didn't have blank,' no, they didn't."
Killed (and approximate distance from the National Guard):
*Jeffrey Glenn Miller; age 20; 265 ft (81 m) shot through the mouth; killed instantly
*Allison B. Krause; age 19; 343 ft (105 m) fatal left chest wound; died later that day
*William Knox Schroeder; age 19; 382 ft (116 m) fatal chest wound; died almost an hour later in a hospital while undergoing surgery
*Sandra Lee Scheuer; age 20; 390 ft (120 m) fatal neck wound; died a few minutes later from loss of blood
Wounded (and approximate distance from the National Guard):
*Joseph Lewis Jr.; 71 ft (22 m); hit twice in the right abdomen and left lower leg
*John R. Cleary; 110 ft (34 m); upper left chest wound
*Thomas Mark Grace; 225 ft (69 m); struck in left ankle
*Alan Michael Canfora; 225 ft (69 m); hit in his right wrist
*Dean R. Kahler; 300 ft (91 m); back wound fracturing the vertebrae, permanently paralyzed from the chest down
*Douglas Alan Wrentmore; 329 ft (100 m); hit in his right knee
*James Dennis Russell; 375 ft (114 m); hit in his right thigh from a bullet and in the right forehead by birdshot, both wounds minor
*Robert Follis Stamps; 495 ft (151 m); hit in his right buttock
*Donald Scott MacKenzie; 750 ft (230 m); neck wound
Legal action against the guardsmen and others
Eight of the guardsmen were indicted by a grand jury. The guardsmen claimed to have fired in self-defense, a claim that was generally accepted by the criminal justice system. In 1974 U.S. District Judge Frank Battisti dismissed charges against all eight on the basis that the prosecution's case was too weak to warrant a trial.
from Wikipedia
edit on 26-9-2012 by Panic2k11 because: source attribution visible, added victims and corrected spelling
Originally posted by ThisIsNotReality
I don't like violence, but that was awesome.
The people in here going "what a pussy move, wait till he's alone and then get at him", did you even watch the entire video? 90% of it is 5 or more cops dragging a single guy towards their cute centre only to beat and kick the individual a little more in a place that is safer for the cops. How do you justify this? People are people, they can make mistakes, like kick an off-guard cop, but cops? They are supposed to set the example, if you lead by example with violence, you can damn well expect the people to follow. Unlike what most believe, people are not always sheep, they can and will stand their ground, they have done so in the past, and will continue to do so. No amount of fluoridation and food poisoning can numb the population enough to stand idle when a bunch of pigs drag a single person from the crowd only to beat him up when he's on the ground, when it becomes "us vs them" people WILL pick a side, as shown in this video, and many other so called riots.
It's always the protesters that get the blame, sure there are some that incite the violence, but the cops take an equal size of the cake, believe me You don't show up in riot gear if all you're going to do is keep the peace, protection is one thing, going out there in armor is another. A cop in regular gear will only be assaulted by the true thugs among the protesters, but one in armor? That's basically like saying in advance "I'm going to kick the sh*t out of you, so you might as well fight back"edit on 26/9/12 by ThisIsNotReality because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by subject x
With a crowd like that, all they need to do is walk forward and the cops are done.
It's tough to swing a baton when you're packed in like sardines.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by mikellmikell
Kinda cute they wait till all the camera people are ready then pick the person who is least likely to fight back.
Meh, another group of people mad they don't get free #.
Ummm, do you have any idea what is actually in there austerity bill? Did you just wanna talk that bad????
These people are expected to work, more hours, for less pay, and pay more taxes, while government spending is cut, thus potentially increasing their expenses...............
Right. They don't want to have to work harder for entitlements in a failing economy. The coffers are empty because the government benefits and light workload that went with those benefits. It was unsustainable programs that they demanded that caused the financial mess. There is no free lunch but they have not learned that yet.
Entitlements, like affordable food and shelter? HOW DARE THEY!!!
You must be one of those "money makes the world go 'round, deal with it" type people..
No, I'm one of those "socialism does not work" and "the best person to help you is yourself" type people. The reason why Spain is in such distress is that people voted themself entitlements but didn't want to work for them. WHen the money runs out, so do the entitlements. If they put all of that energy from the protest, into making themselves better, they could. BUt hard work is for suckers. THe biggest problem of socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by mikellmikell
Kinda cute they wait till all the camera people are ready then pick the person who is least likely to fight back.
Meh, another group of people mad they don't get free #.
Ummm, do you have any idea what is actually in there austerity bill? Did you just wanna talk that bad????
These people are expected to work, more hours, for less pay, and pay more taxes, while government spending is cut, thus potentially increasing their expenses...............