It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CBS Doesn’t Air Portion Of Obama Interview Where He Admits Some Of His Campaign Ads Go ‘Overboar

page: 2
11
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by The Old American
 


Can you point me to a politician who isn't a liar perhaps? I actually would love to find one so that I can write his name in this November.

~Heff


Obama is like George Washington he never lied



On topic:

Obama admitting his ads go overboard would show the people he is doing whatever it takes to get elected which is not a good thing.

anything goes.




posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:20 PM
link   
The excuses in this thread for the liberal media are shallow and laughable. If Fox had content edited a Romney interview there would be a 1500 page thread about it.



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by The Old American
 


Can you point me to a politician who isn't a liar perhaps? I actually would love to find one so that I can write his name in this November.

~Heff


Ron Paul
(Do I win a ats award for getting this answer correct?).

Ron Paul was forged directly by the breath of god, programmed to bring forth nirvana. He is literally incapable of lying, has no agenda that doesn't involve bringing fortune and prosperity to every single person on earth, can part water by simply raising his hands, etc...
Shesh, you new here or what?!!



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:21 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 



Originally posted by neo96

Obama is like George Washington he never lied

On topic:
Obama admitting his ads go overboard would show the people he is doing whatever it takes to get elected which is not a good thing.
anything goes.


Actually Obama, IMO was a bit more honest than most these days. We both know that the usual reaction to this is to blame the SuperPacs and state that the candidate was not fully aware, or some such.

At least Obama didn't pass the buck this time.

~Heff



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:26 PM
link   
reply to post by PvtHudson
 




Fox is the only network to have a truly balanced demographic.


Seriously? Now you just playing with people here. Stir up a little controversy, just for the lulz, why not.

Just in case you are serious, i'd suggest you do yourself a favour. This is a conspiracy site, such ideas can safely be entertained here.
Start a little research on who's funding practically all major networks. It shouldn't take you more then 30mins to find out that the same think tanks, institutions etc., thru the media, playing both sides of the fence.

You successfully blew the cover of one side. Why stop here...?


edit on 24-9-2012 by talklikeapirat because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:30 PM
link   
Give me a break. is this really big news.

So you are saying 60 Minute edited part of the interview with Obama.

I wonder did they edit anything from the interview from Romney.. Sure did.

Does it surprise you that shows edit things?

edit on 24-9-2012 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by jjkenobi
The excuses in this thread for the liberal media are shallow and laughable. If Fox had content edited a Romney interview there would be a 1500 page thread about it.


Because it would be true and it would warrant 1500 pages of discovery.



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by jjkenobi
The excuses in this thread for the liberal media are shallow and laughable. If Fox had content edited a Romney interview there would be a 1500 page thread about it.


They don't need content editing..they are the gop campaign platform...they coach him beforehand on what to say, and try to find the softest softball questions to give him.


Who cares?
Hmm.
Well, lets ask that socialist pinko Sarah Palin if she cares



John Bolton (Fox News Contributor, Romney Adviser)
Role with Romney campaign: Foreign policy adviser. [MittRomney.com, 3/27/12; The New York Times, 6/27/12]; Campaign surrogate. [MittRomney.com, 8/11/12; 8/23/12; Palm Beach Post, 9/9/12]

Elaine Chao (Fox News Contributor, Romney National Chair)
Role with Romney campaign: National chair, Asian Americans & Pacific Islanders for Romney. [MittRomney.com, 8/2/12]

Walid Phares (Fox News Analyst, Romney Adviser)
Role with Romney campaign: Special adviser, Foreign Policy and National Security Advisory Team; Co-chair, Middle East & North Africa working group. [MittRomney.com, 10/6/11]

Pete Snyder (Fox News Contributor, Romney Surrogate)
Role with Romney campaign: Snyder has appeared as a Romney surrogate at several campaign events. [MittRomney.com, 7/25/12; CSPAN.org, 8/15/12; YouTube.com, 9/3/12]


Congratulations on watching Fox "News", home of the Romney Campaign.

Of course Fox won't remove content from Romneys interviews..they will just scrap the interview now if it looks bad and starts over...its what a campaign office would do. Fox News, Your infomercial for 24/7 establishment gop propaganda.



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by campanionator

Originally posted by jjkenobi
The excuses in this thread for the liberal media are shallow and laughable. If Fox had content edited a Romney interview there would be a 1500 page thread about it.


Because it would be true and it would warrant 1500 pages of discovery.


Right... so you are saying CBS didn't edit Obama admitting a mistake from their interview?



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


Aaaaaand that has nothing to do with the CBS edited tape. Keep ignoring the truth and posting your deflections and strawmen.



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zarniwoop
reply to post by The Old American
 


They also didn't air the Romney segment about the stealth fund raiser recording and the 47 % .

I actually thought 60 minutes did a pretty good, balanced job on this piece. I was expecting less.


Balanced? They didn't ask to see his birth certificate..the super long form, and his college papers, elementry school finger painting, or anything
and not once did they call him a socialist al-queda sleeper cell muslim.

Clearly by leaving this out, they are totally in the tank liberals!



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by jjkenobi
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


Aaaaaand that has nothing to do with the CBS edited tape. Keep ignoring the truth and posting your deflections and strawmen.


I was answering the question posed...
Who are you getting all up in my grill without even seeing what I was responding to? Its your statement..you can't just change subjects when you don't like the answer!

As far as the snipped moment of Obama being human, yes..as I said, this demonstrates a clear conservative agenda by msm for removing a thoughtful moment from Obama.


edit on 24-9-2012 by SaturnFX because: clarification



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:40 PM
link   
reply to post by jjkenobi
 


Or you could stop deflecting and address the issue that all such interviews are edited, on both sides of the isle, by networks - for content - and with contracts allowing final review to the candidate or his/her staffers.

IE... everyone does it.

~Heff



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:41 PM
link   


It's called "editing". All interviews are edited. Deal with it.
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 
!
Perhaps. However, people ask legitimate questions when all of the editing goes in one direction, namely to the left.
It seems as if ANY true news which makes Obama look bad gets "edited out" by the left-leaning MSM. What a surprise. Reminds me of the old USSR and Pravda. Instead of the mantra "All the News That's Fit to Print", it's become "All the News That Fits our Agenda".



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by jjkenobi

Originally posted by campanionator

Originally posted by jjkenobi
The excuses in this thread for the liberal media are shallow and laughable. If Fox had content edited a Romney interview there would be a 1500 page thread about it.


Because it would be true and it would warrant 1500 pages of discovery.


Right... so you are saying CBS didn't edit Obama admitting a mistake from their interview?


Where did I say that?

I simply saying; not only would FOX edit something 57 times, but they would run with it for 3 years and
bring it up at least once a week. ACORN, CLOWARD PIVEN and FAST and FURIOUS.



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
It's called "editing". All interviews are edited. Deal with it.


It is just "Convenient" that some of the most important parts were edited onto the production room floor. But no worries... it's your guy being protected...


I think I'll save this IGNORANCE in a special place so when you begin your partisan whining I can whip this handy quote out!



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:58 PM
link   
reply to post by The Old American
 



Originally posted by The Old American
There's editing for time and editing for content. This was a content edit, and a transparent one, as well.


Can you show me something to back up your claim that this was an edit for content? I didn't think so.

reply to post by ProfEmeritus
 



Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
Perhaps. However, people ask legitimate questions when all of the editing goes in one direction, namely to the left.


Romney's interview was edited, too. It didn't go "in one direction".



It seems as if ANY true news which makes Obama look bad gets "edited out" by the left-leaning MSM.


CBS isn't left-leaning. And admitting the truth - that politics involves lies - doesn't make Obama look bad. It makes him look real. It's a statement of fact.



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 01:59 PM
link   
reply to post by kozmo
 



Originally posted by kozmo
It is just "Convenient" that some of the most important parts were edited onto the production room floor.


Like what? What "most important parts" were edited?



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 03:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by ollncasino

Originally posted by PvtHudson
You rage about Fox all the time, but you're totally silent when it comes to the dozen news networks lying and deflecting for your guy. Why is that?


They rage about fox because its ratings blow the liberal channels out of the water.


10-11PM RNC Coverage — Total Viewers

Fox News: 6,878,804
NBC: 4,770,050
CBS: 3,118,927
ABC: 2,862,656
CNN: 1,473,885
MSNBC: 1,468,348

Fox News Beats All Cable And Broadcast Networks


Do the liberal channels give Obama an easy ride? Is the Pope a Catholic?

It's just a pity for them that fewer and fewer people can put up with their obvious left wing propaganda.



edit on 24-9-2012 by ollncasino because: (no reason given)
p


Hmmm... 6 million.... 14 million ....



posted on Sep, 24 2012 @ 03:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
CBS isn't left-leaning.

Yes it is. They just usually aren't as obvious about it as MSNBC is.

As for See B.S. once again selectively editing information to fit their political agenda .. no surprise.
As for left wingers saying it's no big deal because it benefits their guy .. no surprise there either.

I seem to emember another case of See B.S. selectively editing to fit their agenda. General Westmoreland had to take them to court over their selective editing practices.

See B.S. .... waiting five days to report Obama's gaff 'you didn't build this' .

See B.S. ... selectively editing Paul Ryans medicare comments to fit their political agenda.

Aaaahhhhh yes ... See B.S. .... former home of Dan Rather. Dan Rather who invented documents and rumors against George Bush (43) and his Air National Guard Service. But then when the truth came out, that Rather fabricated everything, Rather said 'the documents don't matter, it's the truth' :shk:.

etc etc See B.S. ... lovely ... 'non left wing' network.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join