Colorado Voter Registration FRAUD Caught On Camera, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 32 times


reply posted on 23-9-2012 @ 10:13 PM by Grimpachi
reply to post by Xtrozero





so I'm not sure what is illegal here or even what would be damage control...lol


Damage control is what you are doing.

As for illegality you must not have read the posts above yours on the first page. Anyone should be able to understand that.

Are you having problems with short term memory loss?

Are you having problems with short term memory loss?

Maybe it is just selective memory. Check page one for a refesher.



reply posted on 23-9-2012 @ 10:33 PM by Wookiep
reply to post by Tw0Sides



Originally posted by Tw0Sides
Originally posted by Wookiep
I kinda feel bad for her, she's gotta be but 18 years old.

So, If your young, and cute, voter fraud is ok.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it.



Show me where I specifically said this?(Edit: I didn't even mention the girls looks, so that's on you) Check my post history concerning the GOP this last year and all the corruption and fraud they have commited over the last year. I am NOT in support of voter fraud in any capacity so I would appreciate if you would not put words in my mouth.


I'll say it again in a different way since you didn't understand it the first time. IF the County Clerks office truly hired this girl to do this (which I doubt), then the County Clerks office should be held accountable. There's just no way this girl knew what she was doing, especially if the County Clerk's office told her to do it. She didn't even know how to answer when she was asked who she worked for. Are you saying you disagree?
edit on 23-9-2012 by Wookiep because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-9-2012 @ 11:43 PM by lernmore
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
Again, WATCH the video. You're being obtuse.

The girl starts out by asking "Would you vote for Obama or Romney."



First of all, get your quotes right. She says "Romney or Obama", not "Obama or Romney".

Secondly, your exact OP stated that

She claims to be an employee of the County Clerks office - but is only registering one particular party


I watched the whole video, and at no point did those words ever come out of her mouth. In fact, when asked if she was ONLY registering republicans, she said "nope". That's the only point I was debating. Devil's advocate, reasonable doubt and all that.

Please refer to a dictionary if you don't understand the difference between "is", and "trying".

As for being obtuse, claiming that I don't understand the broader issue is merely your own doublespeak tugging at your emotions.

I thought I cleared that up when I typed the word "intent".

I also never implied that it's "OK", because she's merely "trying", but maybe we can clear that up too.

Take, for example, the Maxine Waters ethics trial last week. The committee took a moment, (which I did not) to clearly point out that "trying" to save grandpa's bank before anyone else's, and arguing that you failed basically falls in the same bucket.

So, sure, in your defense, that's about right, but I kinda' thought I had said so.

Two scenarios that seem a lot more believable than the county clerks office instructing her on exactly what to do:

The kids on the high school debate team decided to get their friends to volunteer, and painted them a "picture".

Her parents gave her the "role" and put her there.

Her body language, and confusion, say to me, that she hasn't got a clue what she's doing... or maybe she does, and she's just a racist.

Nah, somebody put here there, the question is who.


reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 01:03 AM by Tw0Sides
Originally posted by Wookiep
reply to
post by Tw0Sides



Originally posted by Tw0Sides
Originally posted by Wookiep
I kinda feel bad for her, she's gotta be but 18 years old.

So, If your young, and cute, voter fraud is ok.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it.



Show me where I specifically said this?(Edit: I didn't even mention the girls looks, so that's on you)
The cute part was all me, partial to brunettes,

Re-reading your post, I acted in haste, and now get your meaning.

The girl seems a bit confused when confronted, so I too think she was unaware she was sent to do an illegal act.

But she was re-cruited to do just that, an illegal act.

Im sure this is not the last we will hear of this,

BTW , to the many outraged Posters, The lady filming calls her "Honey Bunch"


reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 07:34 AM by Kali74
reply to post by Xtrozero



You're beating a dead horse that never should have been killed in the first place.

But so far ACORN itself has not been officially charged with any fraud. Aside from the heated charges and counter-charges, no evidence has yet surfaced to show that the ACORN employees who submitted fraudulent registration forms intended to pave the way for illegal voting. Rather, they were trying to get paid by ACORN for doing no work. Dan Satterberg, the Republican prosecuting attorney in King County, Wash., where the largest ACORN case to date was prosecuted, said that the indicted ACORN employees were shirking responsibility, not plotting election fraud.

Satterberg: [A] joint federal and state investigation has determined that this scheme was not intended to permit illegal voting. Instead, the defendants cheated their employer, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (or ACORN), to get paid for work they did not actually perform. ACORN’s lax oversight of their own voter registration drive permitted this to happen. … It was hardly a sophisticated plan: The defendants simply realized that making up names was easier than actually canvassing the streets looking for unregistered voters. … [It] appears that the employees of ACORN were not performing the work that they were being paid for, and to some extent, ACORN is a victim of employee theft.

The $8-an-hour employees were charged with providing false information on voter registration forms, and in one case with making a false statement to a public official. Five of the seven who were charged pleaded guilty . ACORN was fined for exercising insufficient oversight, but it was not charged with masterminding any kind of deliberate fraud.

ACORN pays canvassers by the hour, not by the form, but it does ask them to meet certain registration goals. In ACORN’s Las Vegas office, one employee who admitted to submitting fraudulent registrations said that she did so because she found ACORN’s requirement of 20 registrations per day to be too steep to meet, according to an affidavit by a Nevada state criminal investigator. Local news reports at the time also said that some of the ACORN offices under investigation paid bonuses for each registration, or a higher hourly rate to those who brought in more applications. ACORN’s deputy political director, Kevin Whelan, denies that this is ACORN policy.


Factcheck.org

Interesting reactions in this thread.


reply posted on 24-9-2012 @ 07:37 AM by Kali74
reply to post by PvtHudson



It could be fake. We could have a liberal/democrat version of James O'keefe/Andrew Breitbart running around.
I wouldn't rule it out.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags
Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags
A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags
*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags