reply to post by Phage
phage i cant tell you how to post but comon dude,
we both know that most GMOs were designed and tested when only aprox 20% of the genome was "known"
and since then the "junk DNA" has now been better understood.
how can you defend the saftey of this stuff knowing this information?
how can you pretend this stuff is safe now that we know we were "wrong" about most of the genome and its functions?
you blame faulty science but all the studies i have read come to the same conclusion,
this was never fully saftey tested and the science was based on asumptions since proven incorrect,
how can you blame the control size, or the methods?
what about the fact that the science supposed 80% of the genome was waste,?
DO YOU HAVE CONFIDENCE THAT THIS FOOD ISNT CAUSING CANCER?
edit on 22-9-2012 by XPLodER because: (no reason given)