reply to post by Osiris1953
My ideology is not dangerous, its peaceful, but we dont live in my ideal world. I have a different set of core belief systems then you I suppose, but
inevitably I do desire the same things as you, Just through a different manner. I viewed your comments as blaspheme because it was mocking, and
unnecessary. God is important to me, and is related to all aspects of my life, including this. In my opinion, you need Jesus as much as I and
everyone else does, but that is the core of my beliefs so dont fault me for telling you. I couldnt truly claim to follow Christ without telling you
and everyone else they need Jesus, and I dont mean to offend so please dont take it that way.
I can see that we are at differing ends of the spectrum and it is my hopes that we can agree to disagree and rather then continuing in fighting, we
should try and work together to try and come to solutions for the problems we can agree upon so that we can try and make this a better world.
Although I have to say eugenics is not going to be the thing that we will agree upon or be able to find common ground upon.
JESUS SAVES
Alternative to a gold standard..., page 2
reply posted on 25-8-2012 @ 12:21 PM by Osiris1953
Originally posted by TheNamesZeppelin
reply to post by Osiris1953
Although I have to say eugenics is not going to be the thing that we will agree upon or be able to find common ground upon.
JESUS SAVES
So you're for killing others as genetic inferiors? Because I'm against it, what are you implying?
You seem to be intelligent, but you don't really seem to read my posts before responding. You seem to skim, and then react emotionally rather than logically. Please take this as constructive criticism.
I respect your beliefs. I don't have an issue with God, it's his fan clubs I can't stand. Too many Christians don't even understand they're own religion, and that is supremely irritating. I apologize if I offended.
Please understand I disagree with the statements you made, not you as a person.
Have a great afternoon.
reply posted on 25-8-2012 @ 12:24 PM by seeker1963
reply to post by laughingdog
He who controls the food, controls the world.............good thinking, but not so good of an idea....
Imagine cost of bread or pizza if the likes of George Soros, bought up the worlds wheat supply...
He who controls the food, controls the world.............good thinking, but not so good of an idea....
Imagine cost of bread or pizza if the likes of George Soros, bought up the worlds wheat supply...
edit on 25-8-2012 by seeker1963 because: (no
reason given)
reply posted on 25-8-2012 @ 01:03 PM by laughingdog
Originally posted by seeker1963Scary, The worlds grain would not mater, remember the dollar/bushel is capped at a determined price, therefore even if the price of a bushel goes below the cap, the dollar retains it value at the original set price cap. That's why I asked if it would be legal.
reply to post by laughingdog
He who controls the food, controls the world.............good thinking, but not so good of an idea....
Imagine cost of bread or pizza if the likes of George Soros, bought up the worlds wheat supply...edit on 25-8-2012 by seeker1963 because: (no reason given)
edit on 25-8-2012 by laughingdog because: fix
reply posted on 25-8-2012 @ 04:11 PM by Panic2k11
reply to post by TheNamesZeppelin
I don't really know how I can argue the points with you since you make a great confusion of it all, the terms and their meaning and implications.
Communism does not mean no government, no government is anarchism
State socialism can be interpreted as central planing, to some point any government depends on central planing to survive. One reason why we never got a true implementation of capitalism was because of this duology of power and control. Capitalism is in its absolute implementation almost anarchic, it does however not mean anarchism because of its single minded ideology around capital.
Soviet Russia, would also not classify well as state socialism because it rarely worked toward the goals of a socialist state. It however implemented the state control of the means of production and an absolute centralization of planing but in direct contradiction to the communist ideology since it only favored the inner core and that promoted the cult of personality. It started with Lenin but was taken to a new level under Stalin and then Mao...
In any case we are taking the thread in a direction that has nothing to do with the subject. Take from this only that you have several facts wrong and other are very confused.
I don't really know how I can argue the points with you since you make a great confusion of it all, the terms and their meaning and implications.
Mainly because state socialism was a government where all citizens are essentially inducted into the military, which by definition contrasts directly with the ideals of communism where there is no government.
Communism does not mean no government, no government is anarchism
State socialism can be interpreted as central planing, to some point any government depends on central planing to survive. One reason why we never got a true implementation of capitalism was because of this duology of power and control. Capitalism is in its absolute implementation almost anarchic, it does however not mean anarchism because of its single minded ideology around capital.
Soviet Russia, would also not classify well as state socialism because it rarely worked toward the goals of a socialist state. It however implemented the state control of the means of production and an absolute centralization of planing but in direct contradiction to the communist ideology since it only favored the inner core and that promoted the cult of personality. It started with Lenin but was taken to a new level under Stalin and then Mao...
In any case we are taking the thread in a direction that has nothing to do with the subject. Take from this only that you have several facts wrong and other are very confused.
reply posted on 8-1-2013 @ 04:08 AM by zedVSzardoz
reply to post by laughingdog
That would be a really bad idea.
Imagine the effect of a year of ruined crops by bad weather. Not only would people starve but the economy would collapse.
I would substitute it with energy......that we can control....
That would be a really bad idea.
Imagine the effect of a year of ruined crops by bad weather. Not only would people starve but the economy would collapse.
I would substitute it with energy......that we can control....
edit on 8-1-2013 by zedVSzardoz because: (no reason given)
Update...Canada Couple Wins Right To Grow Vegetables On Front Lawn...Case Closed!
Posted 16 days ago with 25 member flags
Posted 16 days ago with 25 member flags
We argue about Healthcare, meanwhile, the Elephant laughs (pls read!)
Posted 13 days ago with 25 member flags
Posted 13 days ago with 25 member flags
A new country in North America? What do Canadians and Americans make of this?
Posted 9 days ago with 22 member flags
Posted 9 days ago with 22 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Officer Threatens To Beat Up Man And Plant Cocaine On Him - Video
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 13 hours ago, 44 flags
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 13 hours ago, 44 flags
Crazy Weather -National Radar (05/20/13) - And TORNADOES IN NY? - (05/21/13) *EDIT*
Fragile Earth: 12 hours ago, 11 flags
Fragile Earth: 12 hours ago, 11 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Bachmann Once Again Invokes God, Panders To The Religious. Where's The Personal Responsibility?
US Political Madness: 13 hours ago, 60 replies
US Political Madness: 13 hours ago, 60 replies
The audacious plan to end hunger with 3-D printed food
Science & Technology: 15 hours ago, 25 replies
Science & Technology: 15 hours ago, 25 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.110 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.110 seconds
