reply to post by spoor
Originally posted by spoor So just which conspiracy theory is the official one?
I suppose this is possible, although I myself haven't seen any evidence really supporting the idea that silent explosives were used. Perhaps some
explosives were used, meaning that they were quieted like they do with guns, but I'm not sure of this either.
the jews did it?
Again, I suppose this is possible, but I honestly don't know what you would call the people behind what almost definitely seems like some cover-up of
what happened on that day. Personally, I think it goes deeper than just blaming "the Jews."
mini nuclear weapons?
This I think is complete crap. I've looked into this and what evidence that's presented for this doesn't seem to be very good.
Another thing in the fringe of the regular 9/11 theories that go against the official story. This seems highly unlikely with all the evidence clearly
pointing to the two planes hitting the towers. The Pentagon, however, I'm not exactly sure what hit that building.
Nano thermite? I've never even heard of this. I've heard of the idea of thermite/thermate being used to help take down the the two towers, and there
seems to be evidence for that, but not "nano thermite."
Another thing that just seems too unlikely, and lacking any real evidence. It seems too unnecessary too, why bother going to all that trouble? Its
I'm not sure what you're implying here.
missile firing aricraft
I'm really not so sure about this, maybe for the Pentagon, but otherwise I'm not seeing it.
the "pod" people
I've never even heard of this.
the jews did it?
Not sure why you repeated yourself here.
etc etc. which is the official one, and who decided their particular conspiracy theory is the official one/
I think what Maxella is talking about here is the typical idea, that the Twin Towers were taken down purposefully through explosives with the help of
the impacts from the planes. It's the one that's most discussed and the one that seems to have the most evidence to me, more evidence than the
official story certainly seems to present.
Originally posted by longlostbrother
And there are many witnesses to the Pentagon that DID see a plane.
To refute those witnesses YOU wuld need to provide video evidence, or any evidence, that something other than a plane hit.
If you have any videos or any other source that shows witnesses discussing the Pentagon attack, I'd like to see it. I haven't seen much of any
witnesses talking about the Pentagon.
reply to post by maxella1
Thanks for those videos Maxella, another couple of things to add to the ever-growing list of the things to look into.