It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Diplomatic immunity is a form of legal immunity and a policy held between governments that ensures that diplomats are given safe passage and are considered not susceptible to lawsuit or prosecution under the host country's laws, although theycan still be expelled.
Originally posted by neformore
He broke the terms of his bail in the UK, and entered the embassy, where he hid behind their diplomatic status for months before they considered granting him asylum - which they now have done as a cheap publicity stunt because the British Government said they would look to revoke the status of the embassy to go in an arrest him.
A statement was made to the world in 1980 by the UK. You do not, under any circumstances, bite the hand of the British government when it comes to the status of an Embassy on UK soil.
The precedent here will not be allowed to stand, because this week its Assange - next week it could be one of the worlds most wanted terrorists, or arms dealer, or drug dealer, or murderer seeking assistance from a "friendly" embassy.
You guys in the states would be happy for people wanted for questioning by US Authorities over there to jump bail and hide in an embassy in Washington? I don't think so.
Originally posted by stirling
SO RELEASE THE GODAMN INSURANCE KEY ALREADY!
screw em....I guarantee you they will send the SAS to clean house.......
Jullians aa dead man....collateral damage....edit on 16-8-2012 by stirling because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by trysts
reply to post by JacKatMtn
I don't get the whole Julian Assange thing. Wikileaks has never informed me about anything I haven't already assumed. I'm going to stick to my gut feeling about him, which is that he works for some "intelligence" agency, and I can't bring myself to caring about his weird situation.
Originally posted by HIWATT
Originally posted by trysts
reply to post by JacKatMtn
I don't get the whole Julian Assange thing. Wikileaks has never informed me about anything I haven't already assumed. I'm going to stick to my gut feeling about him, which is that he works for some "intelligence" agency, and I can't bring myself to caring about his weird situation.
I'm a lot less interested in Assange and/or what happens to him, and a lot more interested in Britain invading Ecuador to try and get him.
"Under British Law we have the right...."
WTF? Since when is Ecuador under British Rule!?
If I were them I'd have .50Cal guns protruding from every window of that place with a big sign out front that says "just F... try it"
maybe a picture of the Queen hanging upside down, bloodied and cleaved from a rope around her ankle as well, just for good measure.
Originally posted by neformore
I think the UK Governments position is clear - nobody seems to be questioning the legality and stance of the Ecuadorians who are, for all intents and purposes, harbouring a fugitive from the British Legal system.
Just because Assange has a cult of personality surrounding him doesn't mean that he shouldn't be treated any differently from anyone else facing the allegations in front of him.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
I think this is hilarious. Ecuador, really?
Assange is not an Ecuadorian citizen. He's just a common criminal and media whore. Ecuador simply looks foolish.
Think about it. They are hiding out an accused criminal not from their country, in a building not in their country. How smart is that?
When it became obvious that Wikileaks was not a place for whistlblowers, but in fact a politically motivated site and way for Assange to get the attention he craves, I stopped caring about Assange. That and his hanging out with radical Marxists. He is as phony as the day is long and I'm surprised he has any followers left at all.