It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An authoritative US military source told debkafile Sunday, Aug. 5 that the American armed forces are standing ready for war with Iran. Without going into the thorny question of who should lead the operation to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program, the US or Israel, it is understood that one of the US Air Force’s tasks will be to destroy Iran’s Shehab-3 ballistic missile batteries which have Israel and Saudi Arabia within range. This task is not as formidable as Iranian spokesmen would have the world believe. Tehran’s entire stock of those missiles is no more than 30-40.
He went on to explain that by wiping out the Shehabs, the US high command would leave the Israeli Air Force free to take on the thousands of rockets Syria, the Lebanese Hizballah and the Palestinian Hamas and Jihad Islami have stored ready for shooting in support of an Iranian missile offensive - not just against Israel, but Turkey and Jordan as well.
Saturday, the Iranian Defense Minister,
Gen. Ahmad Vahidi, announced that his
ministry’s aerospace industries had
successfully test-fired the fourth generation
of high-precision Fateh-110 missiles with a
range of over 300km.
He said that the new missiles can hit and
destroy both land and sea targets, enemy
concentration points, command centers,
missile sites, ammunition dumps, radars
and other targets with 100 percent
precision.
DEBKAfile’s military sources add that the
Fateh-110 is the core weapon Syria and
Hizballah have stocked for destroying
strategic targets in Israel, Jordan and
Turkey.
Sunday, Aug. 5, a senior Israeli defense
official reported that Israel is upgrading its
Arrow II ballistic missile shield, designed to
intercept medium range rockets and fill the
gaps left by Iron Dome.
The announcement
in Tehran was taken in Israel as a threat
and an indication that the improved
Fatah-110 had already been dispatched to
its Damascus and Beirut destinations, so
exacerbating the perils of Syria’s Scud
missiles and chemical weapons which its
government has threatened to use against
external enemies.
Originally posted by seabag
An authoritative US military source told debkafile...
It is a very real scenario, probably one of a hundred being discussed.
Originally posted by seabag
Regardless of your feelings about Israel or the US, what do you think about the plausibility of this scenario? Do you think we will see something happen before November or is this simply more drum beating?
edit on 5-8-2012 by seabag because: (no reason given)
Like this is something new...or unexpected.
It was logical that US will "do" Iran and Israel will "do" Syria and Hezbollah.Not rocket science.And defo not news.
Originally posted by METACOMET
Originally posted by seabag
An authoritative US military source told debkafile...
Caveat emptor
As far as a Good Scenario, no.
Just because Israel chooses to crap in their own backyard, why must the US clean it up?
I hope it is more drum beating. A war would be too costly in terms of monetary value and human lives. I can't remember which thread I read it in, but, another poster said, "In war it doesn't matter who's right, it only matters who's left".
I hope, if this happens, it isn't about getting more votes, but, based on proof that Iran is going to start being the aggressor with nukes. A war started about 'what ifs' and 'maybes' was already fought, and cost many innocents their lives and their way of life.
They do have a lot of 3G missiles though, and I would hate to be on the receiving end of a hellstorm of missiles, no matter what kind of missile defense I would be standing next to.
This task is not as formidable as Iranian spokesmen would have the world believe. Tehran’s entire stock of those missiles is no more than 30-40. That quantity is not nearly enough to take on the entire gamut of potential wartime foes, the United States Middle East bases, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan and Turkey. They would quckly be picked off by American Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense Systems and Israeli Arrow guided interceptor rockets, which are synchronized through the advanced US X-Band radar systems installed in the Israeli Negev and southeast Turkey.
I'm marking this on my calendar. Seabag and I agreed about something.
If that's the actual plan, why would Debka put it out there? IDF putting this story out (that's what they use Debka for, as most know I think) serves some purpose, though I think it's hard to say what, exactly. Just to keep them guessing? I don't know, it's odd.
Also, if something happens, where does Turkey stand in all of this? Obviously they have no love for Syria or Iran, but their relations with Israel have been strained the past few years (after a long time of very good relations). Obviously they are the US's NATO ally and have a close relationship with us. Do they just sit it out or are they going to play some sort of role, too. They are the other major regional power in the area. The article makes mention of them several times as another potential foe of Iran, but doesn't suggest how specifically they would play a role. Just basing, or would they be part of an attack too?
The big question of course is whether this war with Iran will materialise in the first place. I don't think that it will. It wouldn't make sense. My view is that as much as each may claim otherwise, a nuclear Iran would be tolerable to both Israel and the US providing that its regional influence is severely restricted.