It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(Reuters) -
Republican U.S. presidential challenger Mitt Romney's proposal to slash income taxes by 20 percent across the board would boost income for the wealthiest taxpayers while reducing it for the middle class, according to a nonpartisan analysis released on Wednesday.
The report by the centrist Tax Policy Center found that Romney's tax cuts would boost after-tax income by an average of 4.1 percent for those earning more than $1 million a year,
while reducing by an average of 1.2 percent the after-tax income of individuals earning less than $200,000.
The Tax Policy Center, a joint venture between the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, is led by Donald Marron, a former economic official in the administration of Republican President George W. Bush.
Another of the study's authors, William Gale, was an economic adviser to Republican President George H.W. Bush.
"President Obama continues to tout liberal studies calling for more tax hikes and more government spending," Romney campaign spokesman Ryan Williams said.
The good news? Because the Tax Policy Center did not know what Romney would actually eliminate, they took the trouble to construct a wide variety of models in an effort to see what results would emerge under different scenarios involving the many possible loopholes a Romney administration could choose to close and deductions that could disappear.
The bad news for Governor Romney is that—no matter how the Tax Policy Center structured the effort to balance the result of the proposed tax cuts, even going so far as to run the model under the assumption that Romney would first eliminate those deductions and loopholes that currently inure to the benefit of the wealthiest Americans—the result always turned out the same way.
The wealthy win big—middle and lower income earners…not so much.
An independent research and policy institute with a left-liberal inclination, which seeks to improve the performance of American institutions, the effectiveness of ...
The mission of the Urban Land Institute is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
Yeap, those evil GOP. They HATE the poor people and want to see kids go hungery in the streets
I also hear they eat babys
The good news? Because the Tax Policy Center did not know what Romney would actually eliminate, they took the trouble to construct a wide variety of models in an effort to see what results would emerge under different scenarios involving the many possible loopholes a Romney administration could choose to close and deductions that could disappear.
Originally posted by kozmo
Oh, a NEAT-O!!! A study from the Tax Policy Center... which is made up of elements of the Brookings Institute and the Urban Institute.
Let's look at the Brookings Institue first. This comes right from their google snippet:
An independent research and policy institute with a left-liberal inclination, which seeks to improve the performance of American institutions, the effectiveness of ...
And still, all we got today was a statement that the report is to be discredited because the organization publishing the study is a ‘liberal’ think tank—despite the fact that the Tax Policy Center is generally regarded as unbiased (with some argument to be made that they might lean a bit to the left) and despite the fact that Romney himself has previously labeled the group as “objective”.
Something is wrong here. Either Governor Romney should tell us why the study fails or acknowledge that the tax cuts he proposes for the wealthy will either result in increased taxes for to those who earn less or will not, in fact, be revenue neutral after all.
If you are willing to let the Republican presidential campaign off the hook by dismissing what is a fairly extensive, fair and balanced report (I suggest you read the study)—where the authors actually appear to go to the extreme to give the Governor the benefit of the doubt—then I have some California government bonds I’d like to sell you. They’re a great investment…honest.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by Indigo5
Of course you are just going to get Republican voters come to this thread and either ignore the substance entirely or attack the source.
His plan includes...
Permanently extending the Bush era tax breaks..
Eliminating taxation of Investment Income for most individuals
Dropping the Top rate from 35% to 25%
Reduce the Corporate Rate from 35% to 25%
Eliminating the estate tax...inheritance tax
Permanently extending the Bush era tax breaks..
Eliminating taxation of Investment Income for most individuals
Dropping the Top rate from 35% to 25%
Reduce the Corporate Rate from 35% to 25%
Eliminating the estate tax...inheritance tax
I'm not a Romney supporter - not by a long shot.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by kozmo
I'm not a Romney supporter - not by a long shot.
But you will defend him in thread after thread...and ultimately you will vote for him to attempt to defeat Obama.
It's hilarious that people are so embarressed to support the GOP with Romney at the top that they will try to lie to themselves.
Originally posted by kozmo
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Source? I'd like to read this. To date I have yet to see Romney's proposed "tax plan." If your quotes can be attributed to his published tax plan, we have a HUGE problem here. If this is the speculation and fabrication gleened from the "Study" then YOU have a huge problem here.
Originally posted by kozmo
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Source? I'd like to read this.
I'm a Constitutional Libertarian.
Originally posted by kozmo
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
These items, from the "plan" you linked to, include the following:
•Make permanent, across-the-board 20 percent cut in marginal rates
•Maintain current tax rates on interest, dividends, and capital gains
•Eliminate taxes for taxpayers with AGI below $200,000 on interest, dividends, and capital gains
•Eliminate the Death Tax
•Repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)
I'm not seeing any of the things you quoted. So either you have mis-quoted, in violation of T&C's or you have made an egregious mistake that requires correcting. Which is it?