It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A new poll finds 80% of Americans think Iran has a nuclear weapons program and that it is a threat to the US and its NATO allies. The poll, commissioned by The Israel Project, asked likely voters and found “72% of Democrats, 81% of independents and 89% of Republicans were convinced the Iranians were building nuclear weapons.”
Contrast these beliefs with the facts: The consensus in the whole of the intelligence community in the US (and Israel) is that Iran has no nuclear weapons program and has yet to demonstrate any intention of starting one anytime soon.
But false beliefs persist even when there has been ample reassurances from elite sources in politics, the military, and the news media that Iran has no weapons program. A matter of months ago, the Obama administration marched out their minions, from Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey, all of whom reiterated the fact that Iran has no nuclear weapons program, despite constant rhetoric to the contrary.
And when briefly-appearing facts are explained in Washington and the media, it actually doesn’t hold much sway. Back in 2010, Joe Keohane wrote a piece in the Boston Globe about how political science research shows that “facts don’t necessarily have the power to change our minds.” He cited recent studies which found that
when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts, they found, were not curing misinformation. Like an underpowered antibiotic, facts could actually make misinformation even stronger.
when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts, they found, were not curing misinformation. Like an underpowered antibiotic, facts could actually make misinformation even stronger.
As a moderator yourself, expectations are higher from yo
If you wish to use logic, then I suggest you apply honest logic to your own post. China has NOT threaten to nuke USA the way Persia had threatened to wipe Israelis off the map, with often chants of death to jews and to americans.
There is no need for any war. NO humans except the deranged militants want it.
All that persian apostate leader needs to do is come to the table and agree to a clean inspectiong by the free world through the IAEA whom are trusted to inspect and had inspect worldwide nuke facillities, not only for nuke weapon programmes, but for nuke safety espacially.
Bootlicking that persian apostate is tantamount to encouraging him to stick their middle finger to the world, a world that is VERY concern with nuke energy now, with Fukishima being the latest man made neglect disaster.
Think the root of the problem, and not let your mind be distracted and misled with unproven silly alphabet agencies shennigan conspiracies.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
China has been manipulating it's currency however and slowly building an empire of resources that all economic experts agree, threatens the United States financially. Isn't that good enough for a war?
No?
But there's PROOF they are doing this, as opposed to the lack of proof with Iran, but you're willing to attack them right?
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
. Even in the midst of proper information being given, some people still refuse to change their opinion.
~Tenthedit on 8/1/2012 by tothetenthpower because: (no reason given)edit on 8/1/2012 by tothetenthpower because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by SLAYER69
Been waiting for that war?
I think however, in today's climate, enough extremists are in charge of armies to have it done. It won't be a world war in the traditional sense though, there's no good or evil side this time.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by SLAYER69
There's only a good or bad side if you choose a side. I sit on the fence and tell both sides they are wrong for ever starting the conflict in the first place.
I'm not advocating a conflict but sometimes there are good fights. Rightly or wrongly the loser gets demonized and the winner writes the history.
Originally posted by earthdude
They should have as much right to nuclear weapons as the people who have used them. End of debate. No use in trying to vilify them. That is a child's game. These are humans involved in an international desire for peace. To try and characterize them as aggressive just reveals the deception of your plan for world domination. If you are not in on the plan, you are a gullible fool.