Nevada base? What the heck is all this?

page: 1
2

log in

join

posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 06:43 PM
link   
And what is all that stuff within about a 20 mile radius of them?

Google Earth coordinates for items to be identified: 37°21'59.75"N 116°49'59.02"W , 37°24'9.41"N 116°52'2.22"W

There's just a whole bunch of weird stuff down there in a pretty large barren area.




posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Bilk22
 


It looks like a mock-up airfield. Those are obviously jets but they aren't necessarily operational jets. Especially on a dirt runway with no support equipment in sight. This could be a bombing training ground or something like that.

37°21'59.75"N 116°49'59.02"W



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 06:59 PM
link   
Ya, not far from where you posted there is another "airfield" that has had the stuffing bombed out of it.. so I'm going with bombing ranges.

37°26'8.35"N, 116°51'51.84"W



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 07:10 PM
link   
And this: 37°19'20.37"N 116°47'9.37"W A Star of David there? What the heck?



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 07:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Bilk22
 


37°25'3.72"N 116°51'39.52"W
Is that a train? Interesting area you found OP.

That "city" to the right of the train could be a urban warfare training site maybe?
edit on 20-7-2012 by Yngvarr because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 07:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bilk22
And this: 37°19'20.37"N 116°47'9.37"W A Star of David there? What the heck?


SAM (surface-to-air missile) site.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 07:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by xrevxoltx

Originally posted by Bilk22
And this: 37°19'20.37"N 116°47'9.37"W A Star of David there? What the heck?


SAM (surface-to-air missile) site.


The Star of David has missiles below it?



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 07:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bilk22

Originally posted by xrevxoltx

Originally posted by Bilk22
And this: 37°19'20.37"N 116°47'9.37"W A Star of David there? What the heck?


SAM (surface-to-air missile) site.


The Star of David has missiles below it?


I would wager that the gear has long since been removed.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 07:20 PM
link   
It could be possibly be a part of Area 51. Or just a bombing test field.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 07:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Yngvarr
 

All part of Nellis. EC South to be exact.
files.air-attack.com...


EC South. This range contains a limited number of electronic threat simulators representing both missiles and AAA, and provides a separate area for tactics development and training in the use of anti-radiation missiles against electronic threats.

air-attack.com...


edit on 7/20/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 07:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bilk22
And this: 37°19'20.37"N 116°47'9.37"W A Star of David there? What the heck?


lol looks like some alien made some nazca-lines type dirt-crop-circle design of a merkaba overlayed over a drawing of the earth.. then the military found it and tried to scribble it out by driving over it a milliontimes and making roads over it.

heh.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 08:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bilk22
The Star of David has missiles below it?


It's the typical pattern for an SA-2 SAM site. If you google SA-2 SAM site images, you'll see several cold war era images.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 10:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by _Del_

Originally posted by Bilk22
The Star of David has missiles below it?


It's the typical pattern for an SA-2 SAM site. If you google SA-2 SAM site images, you'll see several cold war era images.


OK but why the Star of David?





posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:40 PM
link   
reply to post by Bilk22
 

Ask the Soviets...oh wait, we can't.
The pattern of roadways allows efficient access to the launchers by support vehicles.


edit on 7/20/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 21 2012 @ 12:30 AM
link   
There are six missiles in a battery because the system can guide up to three missiles at a single target at a time. So the battery contains enough ready missiles for two full salvos. They are separated by roughly 100 yards to minimize the ability of a single aircraft to take out multiple launchers in a single run. There are additional missiles not on launchers located near the command center/radar installation in the middle. The quickest way between those (or any six) points is going to form the basis of a hexagon.


There's one near Daraa, Syria for you.
maps.google.com...,36.483333&ie=UTF8&ll=32.635513,36.180698&spn=0.002665,0.00515&z=18

I'm sure Syria isn't in on a massive Zionist conspiracy (nor were the Soviets).



posted on Jul, 25 2012 @ 05:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Bilk22
 


Why not?

If it was a five pointed star would we think it has something to do with Satanic rituals?

Why do we get so hung up on stuff that means nothing more than what it is?



posted on Jul, 25 2012 @ 08:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by pacifier2012
reply to post by Bilk22
 


Why not?

If it was a five pointed star would we think it has something to do with Satanic rituals?

Why do we get so hung up on stuff that means nothing more than what it is?

The idea was presented that the configuration was required for servicing and reloading. I can easily see alternatives to that configuration. Symbolism is a powerful tool. Why mark sensitive weapons locations with what at the very least, appears to be a giant target? It just looks odd and raises suspicious intent.



posted on Jul, 25 2012 @ 11:32 AM
link   
Sure there are alternatives. The ones that make sense would be multiples of three. 3, 6, 9, 12, ...



posted on Jul, 25 2012 @ 10:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by _Del_
Sure there are alternatives. The ones that make sense would be multiples of three. 3, 6, 9, 12, ...


If the launchers were grouped in threes, the battery would be triangular, and there would be threads here about the Illuminati or the Freemason symbolism. Three launchers would also mean more command vans (to control more batteries) that sat idle more (since they would have to wait for the launchers to recycle before engaging another target).

If the launchers were grouped in batteries of nine or twelve, there would still be threads on ATS tying the shape of the battery to some obscure group by way of some equally obscure numerology...and the batteries would be too large to be practical...with that many service crews and vehicles, the access roads would have to be wider (allowing more vehicle traffic) and the batteries would be more spread out (to insure sufficient space between launchers) making the battery more vulnerable to attack and more difficult to site.

Six launchers per battery isn't the result of any Zionist / Satanic / Fill-in-the-blank conspiracy, it's simply the best compromise between all the different factors that determine what makes the best battery configuration for that particular missile system...but there doesn't seem to be any way to convince some people of a mundane explanation.



posted on Jul, 25 2012 @ 10:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Brother Stormhammer
 


Completely agree


I suppose I should say something in another line...






top topics



 
2

log in

join